Talk:Fundamental (Pet Shop Boys album)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B	This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
The following comments were left by the quality and importance raters: (edit · refresh) Article requirements: Y All the start class criteria Y A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details Y At least one section of prose (excluding the lead section) Y A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs Y A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians Y Categorisation at least by artist and year Y A casual reader should learn something about the album.Andrzejbanas (talk) Nice article. To boost it to GA, cite sources where needed. Create a section on it's release and reception. The singles section can be moved to the infobox, as well as citing sources where needed and suggested. There are too many reviews in the infobox, WP:Music suggests that there be a fair and ubiased labeled reviews, amounting around to no more then 10 reviews. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:51, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Original track listing

Is it necessary to keep the originally-announced track listing? The final track list has the same twelve songs, just re-sequenced in a different order... seems a bit redundant. -- eo 12:27, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Good point. It seems to be misleading people, even (so at the very least it needs to be moved below the actual track listing). Anyone else? –Unint 21:03, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

I agreed so moved it down last week. I think it's important to keep the original tracklisting. Jonks 10:46, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

I would love to know what God Willing is about.

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:PetShopBoys Fundamental.jpg

Image:PetShopBoys Fundamental.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:04, 15 January 2008 (UTC)