Talk:Fumimaro Konoe
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Cleanup
I added {{cleanup-date|October 2005}} to this page because large sections of it seem to be poorly translated.--Kewp (t) 08:56, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] About "Prince"
I think he is not "Prince". Konoe family is noble, but only Imperial Family must be called "Prince".14:30, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
-
- Not true. All cadet branches of the Imperial family oke had the title of "Prince" as well as certain members of the Kazoku nobility with the rank of koshaku. "Prince Konoe Fumimaro" is perfectly correct. MChew
- I agree with MChew, actually this article should be called Prince Konoe Fumimaro. Should we rename it? Gryffindor 20:05, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
- Not true. All cadet branches of the Imperial family oke had the title of "Prince" as well as certain members of the Kazoku nobility with the rank of koshaku. "Prince Konoe Fumimaro" is perfectly correct. MChew
[edit] WPMILHIST Assessment
This article needs some serious wikification. In addition, I am getting a bit tired of seeing the Fascism Project banner on all of these Japanese pages. Were the Japanese truly "fascist" according to the German/Italian model? Or were they simply nationalistic, militaristic, and imperialistic in their own uniquely Japanese way? For that matter, were they nationalistic, militaristic, and imperialistic in a way not all that different from the imperialistic nations of the Age of Imperialism which was only just then coming to an end? LordAmeth 02:27, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
I agree. It depends upon how you define 'fascism' and wielding such terms irresponsibly has led to historical catastrophes.
There is no doubt there were people who wanted Japan to become a fascist dictatorship like Hitler's Germany or Mussolini's Italy, but they never gained power and each time they tried a coup, they were soundly put down. So I also have serious qualms about using the term 'fascism' to describe pre-1945 Japan.Befuddler (talk) 02:03, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] About war crimes
"he came under suspicion of war crimes, in which he faced almost certain conviction and execution by hanging"
One might not understand from the article what war crimes are implied here. I think it should be mentioned which crimes Fumimaro Konoye is responsible for because there isn't a word about it in a present version.
[edit] Impressively Unbiased
For years, based upon my back-ground, I had wanted to believe and even learn to prove that the Japanese were totally responsible for ww2 and all, but the more I studied, especially since the more recent authors' works on more released secrecy act documents, that, as you point out, it was definately not so black and white and clear cut.
So I applaud your article as one of the extremely few unbiased English articles on anything Japanese regarding the era.
I might even ask you to point out even more, say highlight it more, that we knew what Konoe was going to propose(since one of the codes we broke were the diplomatic codes) and we knew that by refusing a face to face 'plea' if you like, what that would do to the moderate cause back in Japan. I think it important to make it more evident that it was we who refused that last chance, not him or his gov't.
I might also point out that, from the start, Konoe only proposed Japan's membership into the Tripartite Pact not only to improve relations with Russia, but also that he was always intending to offer it up in negotiations with the Americans to give it up as a concession to increase chances of peace with us.
I believe it was page 1123 of The Oxford Companion to WWII under the Konoe biography, or maybe it was the Tripartite Pact explanation itself, sorry, can't remember, please check at library or if you have the ww2 encyclopedia...that because of secret agreements requested by the Japanese, the Germans and Italians knew that the Japanese considered it a bargaining chip only from the start, not as anything more concrete.
It is to our shame that all the world who can read English see how hypocritical we were and are. How we're for War Crime Trials as long as our people are immune. And how we even tried those who we knew were trying to prevent war or genocides as if they were Hitler's and Goebbel's themselves.
It does nothing for global respect for us to continue this hypocrisy and lies.
So I am all the more impressed with your article here. It is the least anti-Japanese biased report on history I've seen on wikipedia here. Congrats to you.
I'd say Kudos, but I am still trying to find out for some students where the word 'kudos' or 'cudos' actually comes from or means lol. Anyone? Befuddler (talk) 02:32, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

