Talk:Full metal jacket bullet

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Firearms; If you would like to join us, please visit the project page where you can find a list of open tasks. If you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.

Contents

[edit] Hague Convention

The article on the F.M,J, (Full Metal Jacket) may leave the misimpression that bullet jackets were developed to comply with the Hague convention. The Hague Convention sought only to distinguish "ball" or solid bullet ammunition from hollow point or other expanding or fragmenting ammunition. As the name implies, it does not matter whether the solid bullet is jacketed or is quite literally an old-fashioned round lead ball.

The Hague convention was concerned with the morality of using more damaging expanding and fragmenting ammunition in warfare. This moral issue has been revisited in modern times as police agencies observed that Hague compliant solid nose bullets were far more likely to ricochet or over-penetrate a legitimate target, endangering innocent bystanders. Fragmenting ammunition is considered a must for Air Marshals to minimize the risk of damage that over-penetrating Hague compliant ammunition would do to an aircraft. The original Hague Convention’s concern over the excessive lethality and wound damage from expanding and fragmenting bullets seem almost laughable in light of the subsequent use of gas and explosive munitions in World War I.

Jacketed bullets were not developed to meet Hague convention criteria, but rather the full metal jacket variation of the jacketed bullet is made for this purpose and for reliable rapid loading in automatic and semi-automatic weaponry. To illustrate this distinction, jackets are found both on soft-nose and hollow-point expanding hunting bullets and in hollow point target shooting bullets. The difference is the copper alloy cup from which a jacket is formed sees its solid bottom become the bullet base in hunting and high quality target shooting bullets, while it becomes the bullet nose in full metal jacket bullets.

For accuracy, as in target shooting, the precision of the bullet base formed is more critical than the precision of the nose shape. The dies that form the jacket control shape more precisely than those forming the lead alloy core, which is why the best target shooting bullets also have hollow points. Target shooting bullet nose hollows are too small to expand and because their jackets are too thin to hold together on impact, these bullets are also banned from warfare under the Hague convention.

The main reason metal jackets were developed was to stop bullet metal from stripping off in the rifling of a gun barrel at high velocities. Even with modern lubricants and copper gas checks on their bases, lead alloy bullets cannot be fired at much above 2000 fps without fouling the barrel. By comparison, modern jacketed military ball ammunition achieves muzzle velocities from over 2500 fps (7.62mm NATO or .308 Winchester) to 3200 fps (5.56mm NATO or .223 Remington). Because a bullet’s kinetic energy is the product of half its mass and the square of its velocity, the possible velocities for jacketed bullets over those of lead alloy bullets are disproportionately significant to their terminal behavior.

Some exceptions exist for special alloys containing silver or other expensive additions, but generally speaking a copper jacket alloy will have a Brinell hardness scale number of 100-130, while lead alloys typically achieve Brinell scale numbers under 30. The hardest alloys contain a lot of antimony and tin, thus lowering their densities over that of pure lead.

The fouling from firing lead alloy bullets causes inaccuracy, and so requires cleaning too frequent for modern battlefield conditions. It can even accumulate enough to cause dangerous chamber pressures. Rapid firing can cause barrels to get so hot that cast bullet fouling solders to them. The heat of powder combustion causes the residue of the lubricants necessary to shoot lead bullets to build up a lot of soot. For machineguns this fast accumulating cause of jamming would be an impossible limitation.

The lower velocities possible with lead alloy bullets limit their long-range use. The lead alloys are too soft to withstand rapid feeding without deforming a pointed nose. This means the best ballistic shapes cannot be made of lead alloys for any but single loading rifles. Metal bullet jackets address these shortcomings plus allow the bullet’s core to be nearly pure lead. This maximizes bullet density and with it, momentum in flight. The result is better long-range accuracy with less wind drift in flight.

In summary, jacketed bullets were developed to address the velocity, fouling and feed limitations of lead alloy bullets. The ability to form them to create non-expanding FMJ ammunition to comply with the Hague Convention is a variation of the technology.

As you seem to have extensive knowledge of the subject, your contributions to the article would be most welcome. You are free to edit it whenever you please. AlexanderWinston 16:32, 2004 Nov 28 (UTC)

[edit] Effectiveness of FMJ

Is there any source claiming that FMJs are effective in combat BECAUSE they create an injured solider instead of a corpse?

[edit] History

I reworded the History paragraph because the previous version made very little sense to me; I hope that I didn't inadvertently introduce any inaccuracy (I know nothing about this subject) in my interpolation. -- EmmetCaulfield 13:46, 28 May 2006 (UTC)