Talk:Fudai daimyo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.

Start

This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Additional information and associated task forces:

	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met
Associated task forces (nations and regions):
	Japanese military history task force
Associated task forces (periods and conflicts):
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500–c. 1792)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a project to improve all Japan-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Japan-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.

Start

This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Japan To-do:

[edit] Fudai vs. Fudai daimyo?

This article links to the ja wiki's article for "fudai daimyo." However, this article's title is still fudai. The fact that the ja wiki splits it into two articles-- fudai and fudai daimyo respectively-- bears some consideration. Are there any opinions on this? -Tadakuni (talk) 23:31, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

The English article covers the topic of fudai daimyo. I'd favor renaming it that. And renaming Tozama to match. Fg2 (talk) 00:18, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Can I go ahead and move/rename? I've got the sources on hand right now to do so and expand/cite the new articles well. -Tadakuni (talk) 00:47, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

I won't protest Fg2 (talk) 00:56, 15 March 2008 (UTC)