Talk:Frustration of purpose
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. |
| High | This article has been assessed as High-importance on the assessment scale. |
[edit] Complete Revision
This article, like so many litigants, previously confused frustration of purpose with the related doctrines of impossibility/impracticably (depending on what legal tradition one comes from). A quick look at Chapter 11 of the Second Restatement (§§ 261-272) should clear up any misconceptions. Danculley 03:01, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Once again our American friends seem to think the common law belongs to them, IT DOESN'T!!! if you're going to write only about America then at least mention the fact that you are doing so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jd123 (talk • contribs) 16:57, August 24, 2007 (UTC)
