Talk:Frenzal Rhomb
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Frenzal Rhomb is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music. See also P:AUSMUSIC. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia. | ||
Can anyone confirm or deny these changes - http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Frenzal_Rhomb&diff=46320703&oldid=46068373 ? -- Chuq 03:02, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The addition of {{Unreferenced}}
I don't know that much about the band, but as a concern about dates has been raised (above), I've added this template.
If someone has the time to go through and fix shit up, that would be grand. ~AFA Imagine I swore. 15:06, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Neutrality
The language in the Jackie O controversy section, while presenting both sides of the "argument", clearly favours Frenzal Rhomb, making it read a little too much like a fan site. Unless someone can clean it up with facts, it should probably be deleted. Indja 19:41, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- The way it was written in Kyle Sandilands' article was a much better presentation, clearly stating both sides of the argument. I do concur this section is written very poorly though. But then again, everybody knows Frenzal were right.Djskein79 14:21, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
I Find it quite ironic that the two respondents above are both mentioning that one side is presenting the argument better and with a higher level of neutrality than the other. Yes neutral. Lets see Jackie O turns up to the event very late. The band's set has been reduced and she attempts to interrupt their already shortened set. I might be a little upset myself. Lets build a bridge people enough already. Djcorza —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.110.42.22 (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
