Talk:Frederico Chaves Guedes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Sports and games work group.

Portal	Frederico Chaves Guedes is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Brazil and Brazil-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
To-do list for Brazil: This article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

[edit] Religion

Any further additions describing the subject of this article as a muslim, jew or any other religion without specific evidence will be reverted. Even if he is religious, it's only relevant to his notability if he has publicly declared it to be or made overt reference to it in his capacity as a professional footballer. While such assertions might not qualify as vandalism, contravention of WP:3RR still applies. Nice one. Deizio talk 23:22, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Additional - A google search for ^"Frederico Chaves Guedes" +muslim^ comes up with zero matches which come close to verifying Fred's religion as muslim [1]. This strengthens the case that such revisions are vandalism, and at the very least puts the issue within Jimbo's opinion that unsourced / unsourceable information should be "removed aggressively". Deizio talk 23:35, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Semi-protection

This page has been temporarily closed to edits from anons and new editors. Hopefully the deluge of irrelevant, unsourced statements will have died down when the page is reopened. Deizio talk 13:21, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

It's been ten days now; I propose we experimentally unprotect. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 14:32, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Contradictory statistics

the infobox and the stats table completely contradict each other. any clues? Chensiyuan 12:09, 20 January 2007 (UTC)