Talk:Fraud Act 2006
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Fraud Act 2006 Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland. I did think that I was being of assistance I will refrain in future.
Thank you. Is it ok to post a link under 'external links' to the article Fraud Act 2006
I would suggest that, provided the condition of the copyright waiver is shown clearly on the page (i.e. quotes from the Act must only be from original Government sites, not from other quotes), Wikipedia would be covered. It is virtually impossible to discuss the exact effect of legislation without quoting some part of it.--Esthameian 01:03, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
I find it difficult to understand why my contribution was deleted because the material was Crown Copyright. If Wikipedia aspires to provide accurate information to the general public there must, in my opinion, be room for Crown Copyright material to be posted.
- "© Crown copyright 2002 - 2007
- The material featured on this site is subject to Crown copyright protection unless otherwise indicated. The Crown copyright protected material (other than the Royal Arms and departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. Where any of the Crown copyright items on this site are being republished or copied to others, the source of the material must be identified and the copyright status acknowledged.
- The permission to reproduce Crown protected material does not extend to any material on this site which is identified as being the copyright of a third party. Authorisation to reproduce such material must be obtained from the copyright holders concerned.
- OPSI encourages users to establish hypertext links to this site." See OPSI website
Ron Barker (talk) 11:10, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
