Talk:Frank Dobson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.

Does anyone else agree that this page contains sections which are POV?
SimonMayer 01:02, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Not to the extent that I'm concerned by any of them. Words like pugnacious are arguably POV, but there is probably a balance to be had between NPOV and completely neutered. --Tagishsimon (talk)

[edit] Sit Down for 5min

Please can you sit in a corner for 5 Min and think what you and your cronies are doing to the Labour Party. Do you do it because you get seconds of glory from the Tory papers?. YOU should be ashamed of your self, better still join the TORIES as they have loads of MP`s the same as you. And all because Mr Blair did not want you.

                                         D A Hughes

I'm intrigued to know whether the above edit is asked of WP editors or of Mr Dobson himself ... ;-P --Vamp:Willow 23:31, 8 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Quadruple Bypass

Is under the Criticism and Controversy section. I wonder, Is the fact that he had a quadruple bypass criticism or a controversy? ;-)

--Archipoeta 20:59, 27 September 2007 (UTC)