Talk:Francis Bloy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

	Anglicanism Portal Francis Bloy is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub	This article has been rated as stub-class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
WikiProject Anglicanism To-do:

[edit] F. Eric

I think this page should be back under "Francis Eric Bloy." Here's why: 1) Almost all bishops' pages are under their full names. 2) References I've found on the Web call him F. Eric Bloy, not Francis E. Bloy, so Francis Bloy would not be the expected title for his page (Eric Bloy would be more in keeping with what he was called, though I wouldn't advocate naming it that either.) While the Episcopal Church Annual lists him as "Francis E. I. Bloy" in its succession list, the Diocese of L.A.'s listing has him as F. Eric Bloy.  ~ InkQuill  05:27, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

I agree, for all the reasons you've mentioned. In formal writing in the Episcopal Church, bishop's almost always get all their names. -- BPMullins | Talk 20:51, 20 January 2008 (UTC)