Talk:Framework interpretation (Genesis)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A fact from Framework interpretation (Genesis) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on February 21, 2007.
Wikipedia
To-do list for Framework interpretation (Genesis): edit · history · watch · refresh
  • Combine sections "six days and three categories" and "seventh day" into one section which clearly explains the framework in it's entirety.
This has been done. I suggest that the "seventh day" section be renamed to something like "God's rest" because that is what the section addresses, moreso than the framework itself. Tonicthebrown 01:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kudos

Good work on starting this page! It's been on my to-do list for a while, but I'm glad to see that it has now been done and been done well. --Flex (talk|contribs) 13:46, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] First para and some suggestions

I expannded the first para, trying to make it more complete. More importantly, I edited out the somewhat cumbersome references to "some scholars feel" etc etc: it's sufficient just to set out the idea. BUT, there need to be references to sources so that readers can check for further details: at the moemnt the article is very light on names (Ms Kline is about it). I'd suggest some work on this aspect using Wenham or someone like that. PiCo 12:57, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your efforts, PiCO. I agree that this article still could do with a fair bit of work, and more thorough referencing. I'll try to work on it when I get more time. I think that attention needs to be given to Blocher's work (In the Beginning) as it seems to be a major reference point. Oh, and by the way, I believe that Kline is actually a male (despite the first name)! Tonicthebrown 14:01, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
Meredith G. Kline was indeed a man. It's one of those names that crossed over. Lesslie Newbigin has the same problem. :-) --Flex (talk/contribs) 02:26, 2 September 2007 (UTC)