Talk:Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] let the nation?
'In 2005, the base led the nation in discharges of personnel under the Don't Ask, Don't Tell, Don't Pursue policy. According to U.S. Department of Defense documents, Fort Leonard Wood discharged 60 out of a national total of 726 soldiers (8.26%). This was an increase from the base's 40 discharges the previous year, 2004.'
this is just intended to be PC to the homosexuals and cause embarassment to Fort Leonard Wood. Homosexuals know that they are not allowed to serve in the military and, if discovered, they army is obligated to discharge them. should the Army not follow regulations and let these people serve? putting this kind of rubbish in the article is not relevant. why not talk about PT scores or marksmanship scores?
[edit] ummmm
I WOULD LIKE FOR SOME ONE TO LEAVE A COMMENT THAT EXPALINS WHAT THE DRILL SARGENTS ARE LIKE AT FORT LENONARD WOOD MISSOURI. I MEAN THEY TELL HOW IT GOT IT'S NAME BUT IT DOESN'T ENLIGHTEN YOU ON HOW THE DRILL SARGENTS ARE OR HOW THE GAS CHAMBER IS. I MEAN MOST SOLIDERS CALL IT "FORT LOST IN WOODS" AND SOME PEOPLE MIGHT NOT UNDERSTAND WAY. SO I WOULD LOVE TO KNOW WHAT HAPPENS ON THIS BASE CAMP.
[edit] Proposed split
How many readers look up Fort Leonard Wood on Wikipedia because they're interested in the income distribution of the census-designated place? No, I didn't think so, either. I propose to move the CDP information to a new Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri article, replacing the current redirect to this article. This article should be about the Army base, and appropriate wording should be placed at the top of each article, linking to the other. --Kbh3rdtalk 19:16, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Moved article
I moved this Article from Fort Leonard Wood to Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri. This article is about the town, not the military installation of the same name.

