Talk:Fort Dix
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] "Terrorist Incident"?
Leaving aside the obvious POV minefield, surely it would only be an "incident" if it had actually happened? "Plot" or "conspiracy" would be more appropriate, and obviously with the qualifier of "alleged" until the suspects are proven in a court of law to be guilty of any such plan. Nick Cooper 15:39, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- It's True
--70.126.236.103 03:01, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
-
- So much for "innocent until proven guilty." Nick Cooper 07:45, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- The 2007 Fort Dix attack plot article seems to be keeping on top of the IUPG necessity. Totnesmartin 08:36, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- So much for "innocent until proven guilty." Nick Cooper 07:45, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi, does anybody knows if this phrase has ane adequate meaning in this article?
" umaga sucks ass "
I believe it is inappropirate and should be removed ASAP, but request an experienced editor to do so and if possible investigate who included it. DPdH 01:13, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 1969 riot
Can someone add information about the riot of June 5, 1969 and the deplorable conditions it exposed? Further information can be found in Fort Dix Stockade: Our Prison Camp Next Door. by Joan Crowell 1974, ISBN 0825630355. A summary was printed in The People's Almanac, p. 68. --Auric 17:48, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008
Article reassessed and graded as start class. Referencing and appropriate inline citation guidelines not met. --dashiellx (talk) 14:35, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

