Talk:Ford TH!NK
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of Wikipedia Project Automobiles, a collective approach to creating a comprehensive guide to the world of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you are encouraged to visit the project page, where you can contribute to the discussion. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the importance scale. | |
[edit] TH!NK vs. Think
Do we need to write TH!NK everytime we mention the name of the vehicle. Isn't it enough to write Think in the repeated mentions that are found throughout the article. Regards, Signaturebrendel 06:58, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- This is an interesting question. I think the best thing to do would be to follow the trend set by other articles. DRIV3R and Se7en suffer from a similar handicap. DRIV3R is never called Driver 3 in its article. Se7en is mentioned twice: once as Se7en and once as Seven. Of course, the movie poster listed that movie as "seven." It seems, therefore, like we should continue to use TH!NK. Miguel Cervantes 16:57, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- Okay, I see your point. While I think it is a bit unecyclopedic to write TH!NK, it is probably the best thing to do. Thanks for the reply. Regards, Signaturebrendel 18:37, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- WP:MOSTM clearly recommends Think. "TH!NK" borders on criminal. 24.30.82.227 (talk) 03:27, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, I see your point. While I think it is a bit unecyclopedic to write TH!NK, it is probably the best thing to do. Thanks for the reply. Regards, Signaturebrendel 18:37, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] QVOM?
When did this happen? Maikel 19:21, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- When did what happen? --Miguel Cervantes 19:39, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
