Talk:Forchess
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chess. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. | |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-Importance on the importance scale. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Strategy games, an effort by several users to improve Wikipedia articles on strategy games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| Low | This article is on a subject of low priority within strategy games for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0. | |
|
Strategy games To-do:
|
||
Why is it Forchess and not Fourchess? OK, so it sounds a bit like "fortress"....
I've just looked at the official webpage of the game. One thing isn't clear: is a player allowed to capture his/her partner's pieces?
"Rogers wanted the game to use only standard pieces and a standard board so that everything necessary to play would be readily available." As if four-player chess sets are readily available. At first I figured that you need either two or three sets in different colour schemes or a regular Staunton set for one team and a novelty set for the other. But that page gives some ideas.... -- Smjg 14:37, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
