Talk:Flamingo Las Vegas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Flamingo Las Vegas is part of WikiProject Gambling, an attempt at building a useful gambling resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information).
This article is part of Wikiproject Las Vegas, a collective effort to improve articles relating to Greater Las Vegas (Nevada). If you would like to join us, visit our project page. For discussions that may cover more than one article, see our project talk page.

Contents

[edit] O'Sheas

First, the grammar in this sentence: O'Sheas Casino which is an irish themed casino is located in the same building as the Flamingo but both casinos operate separately should be corrected before it gets posted. Capitalization of "irish", for example, or the lack of punctuation.

Secondly, please refer to other articles that also deal with connected properties to see how they're dealt with. Technically, Bally's and Paris are the same physical building (O'Sheas and Flamingo are not), but they are handled as completely separate entries in Wikipedia. Now that Imperial Palace is part of Harrah's and those buildings are next to each other, do we say that "Imperial Palace is an asian themed casino is located in the same building as Harrahs but both casinos operate separately"? No, as they should be handled as separate entities.

Information about O'Sheas would be better suited to the page of the parent organization (as another Strip property owned by Harrah's), rather than located on the Flamingo page.SpikeJones 03:32, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

Sorry but you are wrong Flamingo and O'Sheas are in the same building and on the same property, If you look up the Flamingo and O'Sheas in the phone book or on any website that gives detailed information about the two casinos you will see that they are both located at 3555 Las Vegas Boulevard South, There has also been occassions that O'Sheas has run low on casino chips and as a substitute they've used chips from the Flamingo on the O'Sheas gaming table. Misterrick 08:25, 04 September 2005 (UTC).

Just like the chips from Bally's and Paris are intermingled, I'm sure. How do you explain the street with traffic light that cuts straight through between Margaritaville/OShea's? Sure, there's a walkway connecting the two buildings on the 2nd (or is it 3rd?) floor -- but they are not the same building, regardless of where they receive their mail. Why not look into the history of O'Sheas, as it was originally a Hilton property and named the same as other Hilton destinations (like the Kitty O'Sheas bar in the Chicago Hilton)SpikeJones 14:54, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

Again your wrong, O'Sheas was never a Hilton, they don't even have a hotel, Your thinking of the Flamingo which was a Hilton hotel property. Misterrick 20:17, 04 September 2005 (UTC).

There are plenty of articles and references that refer to O'Shea's as a Hilton property (before the Park Place buyout, of course). Yes, they don't have a hotel. Then again, Slots'o'Fun doesn't have a hotel and I believe they are a Mandalay operation as well. Existence of a hotel is meaningless. SpikeJones 23:53, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
Ok, Can you point me to these articles and references because O'Sheas was at one point was owned by Hilton but NEVER and I repeat NEVER actually bared the Hilton name on any of the building, casino or casino chips and as to your claim that the existence of a hotel is meaningless is utter crap in my opinion. Also I have spoken to the Licensing and Taxation division of the Nevada Gaming Control Board who confirmed today that the Flamingo and O'Sheas are one and the same. Also I have been tracking gaming for the past 20 years I've attending numerous shareholder meetings, press conferences and corporate presentations so I suspect I know a bit more then you about the gaming industry in the U.S. and internationally. I will be reinserting the O'Sheas reference. Misterrick 01:45, 15 September 2005 (UTC).
Thinking about this some more, my recommendation would be to keep any mention of the O'Sheas facility to a minimum in passing, similar to the way the London Club at the Aladdin is handled. That is, as an internal-yet-separately-operated-casino as part of a larger one with a specific street address. In any case, your passion and expertise are welcome as part of the Vegas Wikiproject; please feel free to join us over there and help out.SpikeJones 22:27, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

There was some confusion as far as the previous names of O'Sheas, I found a map that displays the previous name. http://www.pcap.com/et-map-strip.htm --Ben 23:19, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hill

The first and only reference to someone named Hill is in this sentence: "On June 20, 1947, relaxing in the Hollywood bungalow he shared with Hill, who was away at the time, Siegel was shot to death." Clarification is needed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.219.24.101 (talk) 07:43, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

I clarified it a bit by linking it to the Virginia Hill page.HumanisticRationale (talk) 15:04, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Stick 'em up

Just thought maybe we should mention the '51 Flamingo robbery by major league morons Tony Brancato & Tony Trombino, the only successful heist of a Vegas casino--if you call getting murdered for ripping of the Mob successful... Trekphiler 08:27, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image deleted

I deleted the photo that purported to show the "old Flamingo." The scene depicted could not have been what it says, as The Strip never had trolley cars. This scene depicted was a downtown scene, and the The Flamingo was never even close to downtown. Realkyhick 08:31, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The reason his death was ordered

I was watching a movie on the history channel about this and it said Virginia Hill had been skimming money; and Siegel took responsibility for her which bothered the investors but they were willing to let it go if the Flimingo made the money back. When the Flamingo failed to generate revenue fast enough to pay them back Siegel death was then ordered. I changed it and some one keeps changing it back. I'm going to give whoever keeps doing this a week to respond after that I'll change it back- (Debo7)

  • The current text has been there for a while and appears to be commonly accepted. If what you are saying is correct, please provide a cite to support it when you add it back in. Vegaswikian 06:56, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
    • I don't know the name of the movie I just saw it on the history channel one sudnay ago which I think would make it march 24- Debo7
      • It is the responsibility of the editor making the claim to provide a reliable source for the data. Since at least two editors have seen fit to revert this change, you really need to provide a cite in the article that others can see supports the claim. Right now there is nothing. For all we know your change is correct, but you could have left out a disclaimer like 'some have claimed'. Bottom line, find a source in print somewhere that supports this version. Even with that, there may well be other sources that say otherwise, I don't know what consensus would be reached in that case of opposing sources. Vegaswikian 17:30, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Flamingologo.gif

Image:Flamingologo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:48, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:FlamingoLogo.jpg

Image:FlamingoLogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 10:05, 5 November 2007 (UTC)