Talk:Flackwell Heath

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Buckinghamshire (Rated Start-Class) This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Buckinghamshire. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. ??? This page has not yet been assigned a rating on the importance scale. WikiProject UK geography      (Rated Start-Class) This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements. United Kingdom Portal Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. (Add assessment comments) Low This article has been rated as low-importance within the UK geography WikiProject.

I am at a loss to words as to why my information on Fennels Wood was removed? Anyone fancy giving me an explanation?

The information about the transatlantic terrorist bomb plot searches was moved to a pre-existing part of the article where Fennels Wood was mentioned. There was no need for a separate section entitled "media" as it could be placed there, which you seemed to miss when changing the article again.

In addition, your information regarding Amersham and Wycombe College, while it is in some ways useful, is not relevant to the Flackwell Heath page. As you will now note, I have made a link to the actual page documenting the college, where it would be helpful to add such information.

As a rather juvenile editor of Wikipedia it would seem, both from the lack of experience and your comments, that you need to adjust to contributing in such an environment. While contributions are always welcome, they may not be written in an entirely encyclopædic manner, or be relevant, so other editors may feel the need to change or revert contributions. This is normal and it is not helpful to be vocally offended or puerile (re: referencing) over what is a small piece of information.

In future - fancy signing your name after commenting on a talk page? Maramotus 18:20, 21 February 2007 (UTC)