Talk:Fisher-Price

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fisher-Price article.
Article policies

[edit] Uncyclopedia joke

Should we make a reference to the Uncyclopedia in-joke? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.68.52.133 (talk • contribs) 00:55, February 15, 2007 (UTC)

I don't think we should make a reference to that, despite how hilarious it is. Unless something pops up like "Fisher-Price in Pop Culture". (Kip the Dip 07:23, 24 February 2007 (UTC))

Not to offend Kip the Dip or anything, but I, a devoted Uncyclopedian, would like to publicly apologize for the vandalism that seems to be happening to this page. I'm not totally familiar with WP's protection policies, but a semiprotection of this page may be a good idea. For anyone who's wondering why the page keeps being vandalized the exact same way, it might help to read this, this and this. 71.2.72.28 03:30, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Many of the past Uncyclopedia related vandalisms on this page have been wiped from its history. I agree that this page does need some sort of protection however. A similiar thing happened to the Atlantic Records page after "Weird Al" Yankovic released his music video for "White & Nerdy". Why do people love to vandalize? Kip the Dip 08:33, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
It gives them a sense of power, etc, and the fact that they're anonymous(Spelling is a bit =/) doesn't help either. Welcome to the internet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.90.146.8 (talk • contribs) 08:08, June 6, 2007 (UTC)

I also feel that the joke should be referenced. Why not, right? I, too, apologize for uncyclopedian vandals. We can't help ourselves, we're retards. TheLedBalloon 03:11, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Believe, me, I'm the number one fan of Fisher Price. I have my copy of the book autographed (not by the author, but by some random bum on the street). But how on earth could we reference the joke in a toy company article? No, I don't think it would fit. Kip the Dip 15:55, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
It would be vandalism/copyright infringement if anyone other than 4.252.99.182 did it. And if he did it, we'd have to keep it. Because he is a literary genius. --Sir Crazyswordsman 11:58, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

On the Refrences section, we could just put "Fisher Price on Uncyclopedia, the free-content encyclopedia." There's our refrence right there, and it won't clog the page with non-corporation info. --Ye Olde Luke 18:10, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Still, I strongly don't think we should reference ourself in this article, because it doesn't seem that significant to the subject. We had a hard enough time getting into the Oscar Wilde page. Kip the Dip 22:37, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
No, we shouldn't make a reference to it. That's like referring to Borat in the Kazakhstan article - inappropriate.-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 11:38, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] COI Tag

Please see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Sophisticated paid editing scheme. Please do not remove the {{COI}} tag until you have thoroughly checked the article. Please leave a note at WP:COIN if you clean up the article. Thank you. - Jehochman Talk 04:34, 9 October 2007 (UTC)