User:Filll/AGF Challenge 2:2.4 Other
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- Give the Nakedites their own article and tell them to stop editing the main Christianity articles. Seems like a no-brainer to me. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 17:30, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- While the views of the Nakedites should obviously be discussed, assuming they have adequate notability as an offshoot of the Starkerites, *discussion* as a word implies balance. If the Nakedites are opposed to balancing their views, then no matter if they are acting in good faith to God or not, they should be treated like any other group of users pushing their POV and/or edit-warring and/or being disruptive, warned and blocked if persistent. ╟─TreasuryTag (talk ╬ contribs)─╢ 17:34, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- It is appropriate to discuss the views and activities of Starkerites in a separate WP article specifically about them. Depending on how big a movement they become in relation to the mainstream Christian denominations, it may be appropriate to say a few words about the movement in the larger articles about Christianity, of course keeping in mind WP:UNDUE etc (while the movement remains marginal, probably nothing at all needs be mentioned). If Starkerdites become a really major movement, comparable in size with, say, Methodists, it may become appropriate to include a more extended discussion of their views in the general Christianity articles (provided, of course, that Starkerdites do actually regard themselves as Christians). Nsk92 (talk) 20:02, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- Almost as Cryptic says--an article of their own, and a mention on appropriate nudity related articles, including the articles on Nudity in religion, Christian naturism, but not Christianity articles in general. DGG (talk) 20:24, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
