Feminist theory in composition studies

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In composition studies, feminism’s goal is to foster a nurturing classroom that focuses on much positive, constructive feedback on writing. An instructor with a feministic pedagogy is likely to consciously steer her class away from an androcentric direction of teaching. A feminist approach in composition “would focus on questions of difference and dominance in written language” ^[1].

Contents 1 Beginnings 2 Pedagogy 3 Research 4 Works cited

[edit] Beginnings

In the 1960s, the second wave of feminism was kicking off and one major goal was to raise society’s consciousness on the struggles of women. The goals of feminists were largely carried out in university classrooms. Specifically, in the composition classroom, it was found that the way writing was taught largely favored male writers ^[2]. Female writers, struggling to strive, felt as if they were not intellectuals (Howe). The task at hand then was to learn how to teach composition to women. Women were found to implicitly write differently than men, and men tended to write in the dominant, most oft taught style ^[3]. Mary P. Hiatt argues that the terms “masculine” and “feminine” get applied to styles of writing – that of men and women, respectively – but, instead of describing the style, what is actually described is the male views on both men and women. Her examples include “strong,” “rational,” and “logical” for men, and “emotional,” “hysterical,” and “silly” for women ^[4]. Thus, the aim of feminism in composition studies was to create a classroom in which women perceived themselves intellectual and like their voices were relevant in their androcentric world.

[edit] Pedagogy

Elizabeth Flynn writes that feminist theory “emphasize[s] that males and females differ in their developmental processes and in their interactions with others” ^[5]. Thus, a feminist instructor will take into account the implicit differences of male and female writers and teach appropriately, without favoring or focusing on androcentric studies. Feminist pedagogy involves reading texts written by women, and taking care to understand those texts are not simply appropriations of texts written by men, without any sort of critique of the androcentrism ^[6]. Focus is also placed upon the reading and reviewing of student-created texts. Feminist instructors try to create a supportive classroom environment and validate student’s experiences ^[7]. Susan Jarratt mentions a feminist pedagogy that advocates women writing about “personal experiences after reading women’s autobiography, history, and fiction” ^[8].

[edit] Research

Flynn researched the narratives of her first-year composition students for their disparities. She says, “The narratives of the female students are stories of interaction, of connection, or of frustrated connection. The narratives of the male students are stories of achievement, of separation, or of frustrated achievement” ^[9]. Feminist research “tries to arrive at hypotheses that are free of gender loyalties,” says Patricia A. Sullivan ^[10]. Sandra Harding lists three characteristics of feminist research in her book Feminism and Methodology that Sullivan deems appropriate for consideration into feminist studies of composition, not just the social sciences, which is what Harding is concerned with. These characteristics are, first, using women’s experiences as an “indicator of the realist against which hypotheses are tested.” Second, the research is “designed for women” and provides “social phenomena that [women] want or need.” Third, it “insists that the inquirer her/himself be placed in the same critical plane as the overt subject matter” ^[11]. Sullivan believes these three characteristics are relevant to composition studies because of the common practice to conduct research from a standpoint that is gender-neutral (neither men over women, nor vice versa), gender-inclusive (considering both male and female perspectives, processes, and styles, not just those of females), and researcher disinterestedness (the common practice of keeping one’s self out of the research process in order to allow for an unbiased analysis).

[edit] Works cited

This page has few or no links to other articles. (Tagged since May 2008). You can improve this article by adding links to related material, within the existing text. For some link suggestions, you can try Can We Link It tool. (You can help!)

This article or section needs to be wikified to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. Please help improve this article with relevant internal links. (May 2008)