Talk:Felix Manz
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. | ||
 |
This article is supported by the Anabaptist work group. (with unknown importance) | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
An event in this article is a January 5 selected anniversary
[edit] Question
- What is an "allegorical portrait"? What makes it allegorical exactly? Wickethewok 19:35, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] What specifically is this apology for?
As a student of the Radical Reformation, it is quite interesting that it has taken hundreds of years for the evangelical church of Zurich to make a formal apology to the Anabaptist community. Does that mean that this church now accepts adult baptism as a legitimate form of baptism, or are they just apologising for murdering people for their beliefs. How deep is this apology? What now are they accepting about the Anabaptists, and in particular, are they now saying that Felix Manz was correct in his beliefs about baptism? or just that murdering someone for their religious convictions is contrary to Bible teaching?GlenninBerlin
- How about you ask THEM instead of just making empty and self-serving rhetorical gestures here? Dogface 12:17, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
