Talk:Fatal Frame IV
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| Low | This article is on a subject of low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0. | |
 |
A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department) | |
|
|
A request for box art or an application icon has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department) | |
|
VG To-do:
|
||
[edit] Nintendo
With Nintendo serving as the publisher of Fatal Frame IV, there's a rumor going around that Nintendo may have actually bought the IP rights to the Fatal Frame series from Namco. Is there any way that this can be confirmed or denied, and if it is true, shouldn't it be added to the article?--75.92.186.211 (talk) 20:04, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] rating claim bias?
A line from the article was removed because of a claim of bias.
"Given the themes and content of the previous releases in the series (such as ritual sacrifice), the game is expected to be rated M for mature by the ESRB in the USA making it one of the few Wii games to be classified as such."
personally, I don't really think it hurts the article to cut that bit out, as it's pretty obvious that it won't be rated G, but how exactly was that line biased? Given that part two is frequently heralded as the scariest game of all time and portrays a storyline where one identical twin murders another in a form of ritual sacrifice, I don't think I'm showing any bias by claming the game will likely be rated for mature audiences. I also think it's noteworthy to show that more mature aimed games are being released for the wii these days, alongside titles like mario.--Aceya (talk) 17:47, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
