User talk:Farqual100

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page has been temporarily protected from editing to prevent this blocked user from causing disruption.

 This page is currently protected from editing to prevent Farqual100 (talk • contribs • block logauto) from using it to make disruptive edits or continuing to abuse the {{unblock}} template.
If you have come here to issue a new message to this user, it means the block has expired. Please unprotect the page, ask an administrator to do so, or request unprotection here.

Welcome!

Hello, Farqual100, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 03:08, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Not sure exactly what you're hoping to accomplish, but since you seem unusually set upon doing it (tried twice in as many days), I've blocked this account from editing until you can explain this behavior. Feel free to see our community portal to learn more about productive ways to contribute, or to appeal this block via the {{unblock}} template. – Luna Santin (talk) 03:15, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

doin what?

In particular your erstwhile request for adminship, where you state an intention to vandalize the site. Apologize if I'm being a bit harsh, but I just don't see how that's productive. – Luna Santin (talk) 03:24, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
vandal fighteing so what?
Looking at your deleted RfA page, you said: "Im gonna be a vanal" and answered: "What admin work do you intend to take part in? Vandal". I don't see the word "fighting" anywhere in there. Hersfold (t/a/c) 03:56, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Things don't quite add up, here, but per the assumption of good faith, I'll unblock you for another shot. Obviously you'll want to stay away from what led to the first block. It's generally best to wait at least a few months before applying for adminship. Anyhow, hope this hasn't turned you off contributing, and mind the electric fence. ;) – Luna Santin (talk) 04:06, 30 March 2008 (UTC

what do you mean not assumoing good faith

try clicking the link Antonio Lopez (talk) 17:50, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Penisland"

A page you created, Penisland, has been tagged for deletion in accordance with our deletion policy. In particular, it meets one or more criteria for speedy deletion; the relevant criterion is:

Patent nonsense and gibberish, an unsalvageably incoherent page with no meaningful content.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

If you have any questions, please contact an administrator for assistance. Thank you Loren.wilton (talk) 23:42, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. -- Alexf42 00:31, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Battle of the Somme.
Any further vandalism will result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Nunquam Dormio (talk) 14:49, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Glial cell, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Glial cell was changed by Farqual100 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-05-28T01:37:05+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 01:37, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Glial cell constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Antonio Lopez (talk) 01:39, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User_talk:Antonio Lopez. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Justpassin (talk) 02:01, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User talk:Antonio Lopez. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Antonio Lopez (talk) 02:02, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:Antonio Lopez. Antonio Lopez (talk) 02:04, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Daniel Case (talk) 02:38, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

I don't need to be an administrator to get you blocked, it's called reporting. Antonio Lopez (talk) 17:44, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "My last count of vandalism was at Glial cell‎ and from then on I have not vandalised. The guy who blocked me stated that my account was a vandalism only account. Yet hes wrong as Ive done some good edits at NZ police. The only thing I did wrong was call the guy a retard and shit. Two of my edits which was “vandalism” were just me apologizing. I lost my temper and swore at him which I regret but does not mean that I should be blocked. Does that mean every conversation I try to start up is vandalsim?"

Decline reason: "Calling someone a retard and a shit does mean that you should be blocked. That behavior has no positive effect and has no place here. WODUP 05:26, 29 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Like I said I regret that and wont do it again Farqual100 (talk) 05:28, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Besides that was only one count + some others which do not add up to 4. So how can I change? Farqual100 (talk) 05:29, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "original unblock reason"

Decline reason: "Please provide a reason for your request. — Tiptoety talk 05:36, 29 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Like I said I regret that and wont do it again Farqual100 (talk) 05:28, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Besides that was only one count + some others which do not add up to 4. So how can I change? Farqual100 (talk) 05:29, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "yeah i did, i regret my actions and wont swear again but i find it unfair as i only vandalised 2 or 3 times and sore once - and i got blocked. the guy said I was vandalising his talk page - but i was clearly trying to communicatew and when he warned me again to stop vandalsing i lost my temper. beside s my account wasnt a vandalism accout either - so even if i was to be blocked I shouldnt be blocked for a vandalsim only account."

Decline reason: "This account has no positive contributions, just sneaky vandalism and violations of policies. Legitimate block. Please do not waste our time further. --Kinu t/c 21:43, 3 June 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.