Talk:Famous oracular statements from Delphi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

[edit] Cleanup Tag

Centrix proposed that this article required clean-up, and this was later dated to June 2006, by another author. Could they please state the reasons for the cleanup being required, so that the article could be improved. John D. Croft 03:58, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

For starters, the article doesn't cite its sources. It gives the impression that we have a surviving written record straight from the oracle itself, but I suspect what we actually have are at best mostly second hand accounts of what the Oracle supposedly said. (Specifically, "survived from various sources" as opposed to "reported by various sources" suggets that these prophecies were actually given by the oracle, rather than being distorted versions or perhaps even complete inventions. That's a pretty bold claim to simply attribute to "various sources". On the other hand, if the article just means to report famous statements attributed to the Oracle, which may or may not have been actual prophecies, then that needs to be made explicit.)
On a related note, the article doesn't distinguish between history and legend. Some of the supposed prophecies of the oracle may have not have actually occured, but rather may have been legends concocted later. For instance, the wikipedia article about Alexander's horse refers to the story told here as "mythic".
The article seems to be promoting the Oracle -- it ought to take a more neutral tone. Specifically, it pretty much exclusively reports prophecies that "came true" in some sense. Sure, these are probably more historically significant than incorrect prophecies, but if the article is going to suggest that the oracle was more accurate than one would expect from pure luck, then this assertion ought to be backed up with some solid evidence. Otherwise, it should acknowledge that the Oracle wasn't always right, and that some of its "hits" may have been invented after the fact, and that some prophecies were simply vague enough to be interpreted in such a way as to agree with whatever ended up happening.
The whole conclusion section doesn't seem to have the right tone for wikipedia. Statements like "it was truly an impressive record..." should be omitted, in favor of letting the record speak for itself. -- Tim314 19:56, 21 February 2007 (UTC)


In reading this page, the grammar seems awkward in many places. Fixing this would improve it for the reader.
--K. Haramundanis 20:36, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Most of the quotations from the oracle appear to be from Herodotus, but are not attributed. Why not? The story about Alexander and his horse has nothing to do with the oracle and could usefully be deleted. Should it be? In the mention of the Therans and a colony in Libya, what has Platea to do with either? --K. Haramundanis 22:41, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Battle Of Salamis

The Link Takes You To The Battle of Salamis That Happened Over 100 Years After Solon

[edit] Later Oracles of the Roman Period, 361 CE

There's an incomplete sentence here that seems to have been so for some time:

In 361 CE, despite the attempt by the Emperor Julian revive the Oracle by removing Hadrian's plug and to exempt the temple from taxation and protect its priesthood,