Talk:Faerûn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on November 14, 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep.
This article is part of WikiProject Forgotten Realms, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the geography of Faerûn on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.


This article is part of WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons, which collaborates on Dungeons & Dragons-related articles. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.


Forgotten Realms places is a subcategory of Forgotten Realms there is no need to have both. Being in FR places the article is automatically in FR. 129.132.134.107 09:11, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

I don't understand what's wrong if the article is in-universe. those who will look for Faerun in internet will probably interested in in-universe information. of course, I agree that providing non-fictional material will be very useful and appropriate for an encyclopedia, but I don't think it's very necessary to raise all this fuss 'to delete or not delete'. 81.214.36.116 (talk) 15:18, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

I edited the article to include more about players (real people) using Faerûn as a campaign setting. Are the edits enough to delete the in-universe banner? Rhinoptera17 (talk) 15:18, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Evermeet farther?

How are you coming to the conclusion that the 3e map shows Evermeet as closer than the 2e map when Evermeet isn't even on the map? Rogue 9 09:14, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

I'm new to this discussion, but Evermeet had beend removed from the map for a very pragmatic reason: to much ocean in the map. This is stated somewhere at wizards.com
David Latapie ( | @) 12:22, 2 October 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Why deleting the maps?

Why had the maps been deleted? Aren't they fair use?
David Latapie ( | @) 12:22, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Same question, seriouslly, bring it back(there's at least 100 sites with that map on them so it should be fair use, if not, someone should contact wizards of the coast or whoever, and get permission). I've never seen an artical talk about the geography of a place and not have a reference map. --Wilson 17:21, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

  • That's because you can't copyright real geography. Fictional geography, on the other hand, you can. --Agamemnon2 22:05, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Very true, the last part was to state how a map is needed for this artical. Seeing as it is copy righted, I will try to get permission for it's inclusion from the developer, but if all else fails we should at least have a link to a site that has the map.--Wilson 15:18, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
  • It's not about the law at all, actually, it's just about Wikipedia's intent to have all free content. Even though fair use articles are perfectly legal, they aren't free, so that's why they are discouraged on Wikipedia for altruistic reasons.--Neverpitch 03:42, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Culture and Technology Edit

A description of psionics isn't really necessary in the "Culture and Technology" section. Rhinoptera17 (talk) 14:15, 19 May 2008 (UTC)