User talk:Fabrice Wilmann

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Fabrice Wilmann, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:01, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Fabrice wilmann

A tag has been placed on Fabrice wilmann, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Dethme0w 06:54, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi Fabrice! Since the Fabrice wilmann article is clearly autobiographical, I have moved it to your user page, User:Fabrice Wilmann. --Stormie 07:08, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Stormie is being very charitable. You never did assert notability (to be published, you have to sign with a publisher - this is not stated) and of course, there's WP:CRYSTAL - just because you may finish a novel next year does not mean it will be published, and if it is, it does not mean it will be successful enough that you meet notability criteria. All this is academic of course, because you may not write articles about yourself - see WP:COI. And be thankful for admins like Stormie - not all of us are as tolerant of self-promotion. -- Dethme0w 07:15, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Excuse me just because my username is Fabrice Wilmann my real name is actually Stephen Sacrouge. I only chose that username becuase of his inspring work. And Fabrice Wilmann told me that he already has a contract with Bloomsbury. They've read his novel and think that it will be highly marketable after some minor corrections. So i beg u to put the article back on the site please. --Fabrice Wilmann 07:25, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

OK, sorry, for the confusion. If you are not actually Fabrice Wilmann, then you shouldn't be using the username User:Fabrice Wilmann - see the section on "Misleading Usernames" in Wikipedia:Username policy. Anyway, obviously the content I moved from Fabrice wilmann to User:Fabrice Wilmann is not appropriate for your userpage if you're not Fabrice Wilmann - and sadly, it is definitely not appropriate for Wikipedia, either, an author who allegedly will have a novel published in the future (and has no other claimn to notability?) really does not meet the standards of notability required for a Wikipedia article. --Stormie 07:32, 8 October 2007 (UTC)


I don't see Fabrice Willman in [this list of Bloomsbury authors]. If I did, I'd take it all back. Sorry it didn't work out the way you wanted. -- Dethme0w 07:35, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Don't worry about it then. If i can't write that article then what can i write about? All my ideas have already been written into great articles. Can you please give me some tips? I was thinking of writing an article about a story i just wrote. What do u think about that?

Well the best articles are not really written by one person from start to finish. You could start by working on improving an article that already exists, perhaps about a favourite (published) story or novel. Writing about a story you just wrote would run afoul of the same criteria cited above by Stormie and myself. -- Dethme0w 07:44, 8 October 2007 (UTC)