Expected shortfall
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Expected shortfall is a concept used in Finance (and more specifically in the field of financial risk measurement) to evaluate the market risk of a portfolio. It is an alternative to Value at risk. The "expected shortfall at q% level" is the expected return on the portfolio in the worst q% of the cases.
Expected shortfall is also called Conditional Value at Risk or CVaR.
ES evaluates the value (or risk) of an investment in a conservative way, focusing on the less profitable outcomes. For high values of q it ignores the most profitable but unlikely possibilities, for small values of q it focuses on the worst losses. On the other hand, unlike the discounted maximum loss even for lower values of q expected shortfall does not consider only the single most catastrophic outcome. A value of q often used in practice is 5%.
Expected shortfall is a coherent, and moreover a spectral measure of financial portfolio risk. It requires a quantile-level q, and is defined to be the expected loss of portfolio value given that a loss is occurring at or below the q-quantile.
Contents |
[edit] Formal definition
ESq = E(x | x < μ) where μ is determined by Prob(x < μ) = q and q is the given threshold.
(Some authors define it as the negative of the above, so as to result in a positive number for a loss).
[edit] Examples
Example 1. If we believe our average loss on the worst 5% of the possible outcomes for our portfolio is EUR 1000, then we could say our expected shortfall is EUR 1000 for the 5% tail.
Example 2. Consider a portfolio that will have the following possible values at the end of the period:
Notice that, for convenience, the outcomes have been ordered from worst (first row) to best (last row). Also, the probabilities add up to 100% by construction.
| probability | ending value |
|---|---|
| of event | of the portfolio |
| 10% | 0 |
| 30% | 80 |
| 40% | 100 |
| 20% | 150 |
Now assume that we paid 100 at the beginning of the period for this portfolio. Then the profit in each case is (ending value-initial investment) or:
| probability | |
|---|---|
| of event | profit |
| 10% | -100 |
| 30% | -20 |
| 40% | 0 |
| 20% | 50 |
From this table let us calculate the expected shortfall ESq for a few (arbitrarily chosen) values of q:
| q | expected shortfall ESq |
|---|---|
| 5% | -100 |
| 10% | -100 |
| 20% | -60 |
| 40% | -40 |
| 100% | -6 |
To see how these values were calculated, consider the calculation of ES0.05, the expectation in the worst 5 out of 100 cases. These cases belong to (are a subset of) row 1 in the profit table, which have a profit of -100 (total loss of the 100 invested). The expected profit for these cases is -100.
Now consider the calculation of ES0.20, the expectation in the worst 20 out of 100 cases. These cases are as follows: 10 cases from row one, and 10 cases from row two (note that 10+10 equals the desired 20 cases). For row 1 there is a profit of -100, while for row 2 a profit of -20. Using the expected value formula we get [(10 / 100)( − 100) + (10 / 100)( − 20)] / (20 / 100) = − 60.
Similarly for any value of q. We select as many rows starting from the top as are necessary to give a cumulative probability of q and then calculate an expectation over those cases. In general the last row selected may not be fully used (for example in calculating ES0.20 we used only 10 of the 30 cases per 100 provided by row 2).
[edit] Properties
The expected shortfall ESq increases as q increases.
The 100%-quantile expected shortfall ES1.0 equals the Expected value of the portfolio. (Note that this is a special case; expected shortfall and expected value are not equal in general).
For a given portfolio the expected shortfall ESq is worse than (or equal) to the Value at Risk VaRq at the same q level.

