The following comments were left by the assessors: (edit ° history ° watch ° refresh)
This article would be classified as original research if it had anything original to offer. But its main problem is, as others have noted, that it doesn't cite any research and practically none of the hundreds of other baseball articles on WP have seen any need to link to this article. In principle it could be a useful integrative essay that drew together other articles, a kind of guide to the many articles on baseball statistics and and sabermetric analysis. But it makes almost no attempt to do so. If it were deleted, nobody much would miss it.--Mack2 01:49, 8 July 2007 (UTC)