Talk:Evelyn Hernandez

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Evelyn Hernandez is within the scope of WikiProject El Salvador, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on the country of El Salvador on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

I have nominated this article for deletion because I do not believe that the subject is notable. The notability guideline explicitely states the following:

3. Memorials. Wikipedia is not the place to honor departed friends and relatives. Subjects of encyclopedia articles must be notable besides being fondly remembered.

Facts to support my assertion:

  1. This article appears to be a memorial, and does not offer a reason that this case is more significant than any of the other 93 murders committed in San Francisco or the 16,204 in the Unisted States that year. (see [1] and [2])
  2. The article provides an external link that suggests that this type of murder is not uncommon: Police say murder of pregnant women is not uncommon [3]
  3. The article also states that: Friends and family of Hernandez tried to get Hernandez's case featured on America's Most Wanted, but were rejected because no warrant had been issued for a suspect.
  4. Only two articles link this one: a dab page for the name Evelyn, and the List of Murdered People.
  5. Most of the references provided where originally published in a span of 3 days (April 21 - 23, 2002), one of those requires the article to be purchased in order to be readThe Globe & Mail April 22, 2003, and another is from a blog A debate on the media coverage.

Srice13 15:52, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Sadly there is truth to what you say, but it goes deeper than that. If Laci and Scott weren't telegenic nobody would had heard of this. --Kevin Murray 04:02, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
The links provided in Kingturtle's arguement all place Hernandez in the context of Peterson. That is a good argument that the Peterson case is not notable either. There are many things covered by the media that are not encyclodic fodder. I am dropping my resistance to this article becuase it is realy not that important to me. I do think the Wiki community needs to refine the notion of notablility. This case is not notable because of Hernandez; it is notable as an example of race bias in the media (which was not the theme of the article when I proposed deletion).SRICE13 (TALK | EDITS) 03:28, 8 February 2007 (UTC)