Talk:Eureka, Nunavut

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A population of 0??? Grutness|^hello? 07:36, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)

• While I cannot confirm the actual population, a population figure of "0" actually makes a little sense. First, an abandoned site (which this appears to *not* be) would have a population of 0. Secondly, areas created specifically for research (such as Antarctica) would technically have a population of 0, but have people "living" there seasonally or transiently. Third, an area set up by a corporation or for corporate development, such as Deadhorse, Alaska, also have populations of 0, though are seasonally or transiently "populated" by corporate workers. Hope this makes it a little more logical! :-) Mercer5089 (talk) 05:50, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

QUESTION: If this is supposed to be "global," and by that, I've seen a lot of emphasis on "non-America-centric," then why are all of the American states and most American counties/boroughs/parishes afforded one of those white and red maps indicating their placement in relation to other similar political divisions? While I lack the ability to create these, somebody obviously does have this skill and has used it for American pages...why hasn't this person done so for Canadian pages like these? Even if this page is of an "obscure" topic, I feel I could argue that "Igiugig, Alaska" is equally obscure and has been afforded such a map. Thoughts? Mercer5089 (talk) 05:50, 18 November 2007 (UTC)