Talk:Essays and Reviews

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The current Anglicanism Collaboration of the Month is Essays and Reviews The next collaboration will be selected on 30 April 2008. (Vote here)

↓    Skip to table of contents    ↓

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Essays and Reviews article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Anglicanism     (Rated Stub-Class) Anglicanism Portal Essays and Reviews is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. Stub This article has been rated as stub-class on the quality scale. Top This article has been rated as top-importance on the importance scale. Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. WikiProject Anglicanism To-do: WikiProject Books      (Rated Stub-Class) Books Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page. Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at in the comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) WikiProject Religious texts (Rated stub-Class)   Religion Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a joint subproject of WikiProject Religion and WikiProject Books, and a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religious texts-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details. Stub This article has been rated as stub on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) WikiProject Christianity      (Rated stub-Class) Christianity Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines. Stub This article has been rated as stub-class on the quality scale. High This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale. Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

Contents 1 Anglican April 2008 Collaboration of the Month 2 Darwin 3 Article Titles and Authors? 4 Oxford Dictionary of Christianity

[edit] Anglican April 2008 Collaboration of the Month

[edit] Darwin

We seem to have further reading rather than references. Several points, particularly those related to Darwin, were taken from Desmond & Moore's Darwin, and there are some other details in Janet Browne's Charles Darwin: vol. 2 The Power of Place. Want these added as references, and want harvard referencing in a notes section to give page numbers? ... dave souza, talk 12:42, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Sorry. I was just trying to build up potential references by putting them in the 'Further reading' section for now. But, yes, please add - as Harvard ref - the references (page numbers) from Desmond & Moore, and Janet Brown. Thanks! Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 12:59, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Article Titles and Authors?

While I am not going to be MUCH help this month, I did see that a few of the resources available on Essays and Reviews breakout the various Articles, and mention which of the authors wrote each article; that information may be helpful for a scholarly analysis, though I'm not sure how much further anyone can go (in Wikipedia) with describing the articles beyond a simple table, as it would then potentially move into Original Research to summarize them. Bill Ward (talk) 20:37, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

I doubt 'original research' will be a problem as there is a lot of printed commentary and scholary analysis ... even per essay. It might be more library research than internet though. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 23:30, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

The introduction to Shea and Whitla's edition has more information than we need, for an encyclopedia article; I'll try to add some of it next week. Mgriffin (talk) 03:59, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Oxford Dictionary of Christianity

This has some details that I will pump in here before month's end. -- Secisek (talk) 02:12, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll get back to it again also. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 02:14, 18 April 2008 (UTC)