Talk:Erotic humiliation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Humiliatrix merge

  • DON'T MERGE but DO LINK: A humiliatrix is a woman whom engages in the sexual humiliation of her partner. She may also be paid to do so.
  • Yeah. Sure. I say merge 'em.
  • DON'T MERGE - I believe Humiliatrix should be considered a seperate entity away from the umbrella term that is erotic humiliation, in the same manner that dominatrix and BDSM should be treated seperately. It should be considered that a Humiliatrix is also a slang term for women whose personality naturally finds itself humiliating others in RL without any exchange of money or erotic implication, thus rendering erotic humiliation a dubious alternative. ~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.69.40.187 (talk • contribs)
  • Merge. Fits in perfectly — basicly a female humiliator, and the list of associated sexual interests listed in this article are consistent those under Humiliatrix. Non-BDSM uses of the term Humiliatrix are almost certainly using the BDSM term metaphorically, so I don't think that disqualifies the merge. Please do include a redirect from Humiliatrix. –edgarde 03:52, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Merge - Yes, they both involve humiliation. Both are seperate topics in their own right. Atom 22:18, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect - There seems to be nothing in that article beyond the definition, that couldn't be placed here. Although I'm not sure I'm in favour of stating the term in this article - are there reliable notable sources for this definition, or is it just a neologism? Mdwh 17:40, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Diff between erotic and sexual humiliation?

I'm not sure "consent" covers it. Most humiliation is consensual. Maybe these two should be converged.

[edit] Facials/golden showers

The list here was pretty tame so I added that most popular of erotic humiliations, facials and pissing.


[edit] Freudian slip?

Did the author mean to say "pubic" instead of "public"?
Taxwoman 20:06, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

The article Humiliation (BDSM) is superior. Retain it and cull the other.

[edit] Old content from Talk:Humiliation (BDSM) as merged

The general picture of the humiliation fetish does need some elaboration. I love humiliation myself and very much enjoy being called fat", "ugly", "stupid" or "worthless" and in fact a great many such "insults" are welcome. What matters is who is doing the insulting. For example: I was on the train recently and someone (male I presume) sent me a bluetooth message to my phone. "Cock sucker" it said to me. While it was fun to receive it I didn't relish the fact that the sender was probably male and that it was sent with male spite. However if I had any reason to believe the sender was a woman, it would have been wonderful!

Pafetik

I wonder how could I improve this article without making the first authors feeling offended in case I cut off much of it trying to make it be more comprehensive (cover many points of view) and sound more mmhh... enciclopedic? X)

[I myself enjoy humilliation too, under certain particular circumstances]

Pentalis


[edit] MERGE

I have merged the two articles Sexual humiliation and Humiliation (BDSM), and imported the talk page of both here. The text from the latter was probably superior but I've retained most of both, adding a structure and other information. I have kept the article under the name "Sexual humiliation" since that's a broader title.

FT2 17:10, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Renamed article to "erotic humiliation"

I have renamed this article "erotic humiliation" from "sexual humiliation", since this article is about sexual humiliation in a consensual erotic context. Sexual humiliation in other contexts is a very different thing, and not even remotely erotic. -- Karada 02:02, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Poll: Small penis humiliation and small breast humiliation

I added the word "adult" in front of "male's" and "female's" in the part mentioning small penis humiliation and small breast humiliation, respectively. I also wanted to Poll to see if others wanted to delete the mentioning of small breast humiliation, since, as a connoisseur of Small penis humiliation and sexual humiliation, I have never heard of small breast humiliation. Also an internet search yields very few results, almost all of which were bogus, if quotation marks are used around the search term. I was unable to find any examples on the internet of small breast humiliation being employed. By comparison something as obscure as "small penis humiliation" yields about 75,000 hits. Many of them credible links to phonesex sites actually practicing this technique. In addition I am aware that there are many SPH groups on yahoo, but I could find none about SBH. It appears that, if any females (or males as a humiliatrix) desire this technique, there is no evidence of its being carried out in practice and therefore should not be listed as a "means" (quoting the article) of erotic humiliation that is "verbal[ized]" often enough to merit mention. Others' comments opinions ideas about deleting the mention of small breast humiliation? SPHboy4 23:57, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

You may be right, but the problem with much of this article is it's mostly original research. My suggestion is delete what does not make sense, but only add what can be documented.
Polls are of little consequence around here. Google counts are a little better, but not hard evidence in this case — Google will be biased because of porn sites catering toward more profitable sexual interests. Lack of a pandering porn site does not ipso fact disprove a sexual subgroup. / edgarde 16:01, 14 April 2007 (UTC)