Talk:Erik Rush

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

This article was nominated for deletion on 15 March 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep.

[edit] Significance?

Is this guy significant enough to warrant an article? He doesn't write for any major news outlet, and until his recent column on Barack Obama, has not written anything of national note that I am aware of... And even then, only Hannity covered that particular story, which was majorly NPOV (due to the nature of the show). Discussion? Joe in Seattle 140.160.66.59 20:12, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

True. I have {{prod}}'d it. Guettarda 19:15, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

True: Rush is typical. No orginal thought of his own. Best he can do is tear down other verus offering constructive way to move ahead as a nation. Sad. However, look at the company he keeps. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.169.82.144 (talk) 01:13, 2 June 2008 (UTC)