Talk:Era Vulgaris (album)/Comments
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Seeing new information about the album is appearing almost daily, it's important to decide what is important enough to make the page and what of the pre-album rumours can be considered 'worthy'. red157 14:21, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Reassessed as stub class
The article is roughly B class, but according to WP:ALBUM assessment rules, it needs an image before it can progress beyond stub class! I think it's probably a bit premature to assess the article before the album's released anyway, as there's loads to be added after its release: critical and commercial response, reviews, marketing, audio samples etc...
As the article will keep changing, it won't meet the Good Article stability criterion for a long time yet, so rather than worrying too much about its class right now, I'd suggest trying to add to it and keep it tidy over time. Try another assessment when there's been a chance to update the article with an image after the album's release - Alex valavanis 23:39, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Reassessment (start class)
The article failed B class review on the following criteria (see WP:ALBUM for details):
- Times in the track listing
- Authors for all songs
- Full credits, including technical personnel and guest musicians
Please resubmit to WP:ALBUMA for review after the album has been released. Thanks - Alex valavanis 08:57, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
