Talk:Environmental law
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. |
| Top | This article has been assessed as Top-importance on the assessment scale. |
 |
This environment-related article is part of the Environment WikiProject to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. See WikiProject Environment and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ. |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. |
The entry links to the takings entry, but the link is broken. Should this be to the Taking entry. I ask, as this was flagged as part of the redirect project, on this page: User:Daniel_Quinlan/redirects5. Thanks Silverfish 18:56, 5 Feb 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Isn't this a bit U.S.-centric?
It seems to me that a lot of the content here should be moved to United States environmental law. As an American, I am proud that the United States is a leader in environmental law, but I am also aware of the fact that the English Wikipedia is used by persons from many other countries outside of the United States, and that many countries have since advanced ahead of the United States in some aspects of environmental law (notably global warming). --Coolcaesar 19:34, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
