Talk:Enaction

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] More content2

I think there should be some references to Varela and Maturana and probably a link to autopoiesis and so on. if i find the time i'd be happy to add some stuff myself.

[edit] Proposed deletion

This article goes beyond being just a dictionary entry since it also describes research on enaction. I think it's better to improve articles with potentially useful content than it is to just delete them; see the Wikipedia material on alternatives to deletion. --A. B. 04:47, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] More content

I've added more content related to the Enactive Knowledge, Interfaces and current research, hoping that the current status is satisfactory I've removed the deletion request.

In the meanwhile I've contacted some of the Philosophical partners of the ENACTIVE NoE for improving the theorical description of the Enactive Knowledge. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sankazim (talk • contribs) 18:06, 11 June 2006 (UTC).

Great -- thanks for contributing.--A. B. 20:09, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations by your contribution. Nevertheless in the text there is a confusion. With relation to the concept of enaction, Varela has developed it (although not according to the model of Bruner), but Maturana is not in agreement with this concept, he speaks of "structural perturbation". In relation to this point both thinkers followed ways different. Greetings for everybody. RE. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.22.69.18 (talk) 05:04, 21 December 2007 (UTC)