Talk:Emotiv Systems
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is written like an advertisment. --129.175.240.240 (talk) 11:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
This article is LOADED with unsourced and speculative statements. No one working with clinical EEGs (or invasive recordings, for that matter) would claim to be detecting "conscious [higher level] thoughts." I agree with anon editor above me that this article is written like an advertisement, and is frustratingly misleading to the general public who are being led to think that neuromancer or the Matrix is just around the corner. I'll probably buy an EPOC and want to give it all the credit it deserves--find a source, evidence, and great. But wikipedia isn't the place for Emotiv's PR department or ungrounded speculation. (Also, for "reading the mind" stuff, the burden of proof is a PEER-REVIEWED article. An emotiv press release saying they can do this doesn't count.) -- VSEPR (talk) 20:19, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

