Elon Peace Plan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Elon Peace Plan (now "The Israeli Initiative", formerly "The Right Road to Peace") is a solution for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict originally proposed in 2002 by Rabbi Binyamin Elon, who was the Israeli tourism minister at the time he put forward the proposal. The plan advocates the formal annexation of West Bank and Gaza by Israel, and, originally, the Palestinians becoming citizens of a new Palestinian state in Jordan. Elon and Moledet (Elon's party and the chief supporter of this plan) proposed that "Israel, the United States and the international community will allocate resources for the completion of the exchange of populations that began in 1948 and the full rehabilitation of the refugees and their absorption and naturalization in various countries".

Seeing as it concerned the transfer of Palestinians to this hypothetical designated state without their consent, and that Jordan was far from enthusiastic to allocate its own territory for the sake of a Palestinian state (having reneged on its claim to the West Bank and taken away citizenship of the Palestinians living there in 1988), this idea came to be seen as irrelevant by the majority of Israelis and Palestinians[citation needed]. Elon continued to advance his plan, including a 2004 visit to Jordan for this purpose[1], but did not manage to win substantial support for it.

General public support for Elon and his plan has been ambiguous. The National Union received 5.5% support on the Israeli legislative election of 2003[2] (which went up to 7.14% in the 2006 election after the party's merger with the National Religious Party[3]); a survey conducted by Mutagim in January of 2005 showed that public support for the relocation of Palestinians outside of Israel, a tenet of Elon's original proposal, was about equal to the support of Ariel Sharon's then soon-to-be-executed unilateral disengagement plan.[4]

The changing political climate in Israel following the 2006 Lebanon war and the Hamas takeover of the Gaza strip prompted Elon to resume advancing his plan in 2007, complete with a million-dollar advertising campaign, as "The Israeli Initiative - The Right Road for Peace". Similar in principle to his original proposition, this new formulation gave up on the idea of a Palestinian state being formed in Jordan; while it still has Israel annexing the West Bank, it proposes that the Palestinians would become citizens of Jordan and residents of Israel rather than being re-located (though it also advocates providing them with a financial incentive to leave of their own accord). This idea directly opposes the direction taken by Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and the Kadima-Labor coalition, which aims to negotiate with the Palestinians with the ultimate goal of establishing a Palestinian state.

Part of Israeli-Palestinian conflict
and Arab-Israeli conflict series
Israeli-Palestinian peace process
      Israel
      The West Bank, the Gaza Strip and the Golan Heights1
Negotiating parties
Palestinians
Israel
History of the peace process

Camp David Accords • Madrid Conference • Oslo Accords • Oslo II • Hebron Agreement • Wye River Memorandum • Sharm e-Sheikh memorandum • Camp David 2000 Summit • Taba Summit • Road map • Annapolis Conference
Primary negotiation concerns

Antisemitic incitements • Status of Jerusalem • Israeli settlements • Israeli West Bank barrier • Jewish state • Palestinian political violence • Palestinian refugees • Palestinian state • Places of worship
Palestinian flag     Current Leaders     Flag of Israel

Mahmoud Abbas • Salam Fayyad

Ehud Olmert • Shimon Peres
International brokers

Diplomatic Quartet  · Arab League  · Egypt
Flag of the United Nations Flag of Europe Flag of Russia Flag of the United States Flag of the League of Arab States Flag of Egypt
Other proposals

Beirut Summit • Elon Peace Plan • Lieberman Plan • Geneva Accord • Hudna • Israel's unilateral disengagement plan and Realignment plan • Projects working for peace • Peace Valley plan

1 The Golan Heights are not part of Israeli-Palestinian track

v • d • e

The case presented by proponents of the plan[5] is that Israel, the Palestinians, Jordan and other moderate Arab states would all stand to benefit from such a solution. Ideally, Israel would see a sharp drop in terrorist attacks and the dissipation of the demographic threat; Millions of Palestinians would turn from refugees to citizens and would be given new economical opportunities; and the abolition of the Palestinian state would prevent an extremist threat to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, while international financial support and increased co-operation with Israel would provide financial growth and opportunities (which, to a lesser degree, applies to other Arab states as well). Republican US Senator and former presidential candidate Sam Brownback has expressed support of the plan.[6]

Detractors of the plan[who?] claim that Elon doesn't explain how countries would be induced to recognize Jordan as the Palestinian state. In an essay titled "The Yamin Israel Plan", Prof. Paul Eidelberg wrote that "Even if [the Palestinians] were made Jordanian citizens, as proposed by the otherwise meritorious Elon Plan, it is wishful thinking to believe they will live in peace with the Jews in Judea, Samaria, and Gaza".[7]

[edit] See also

[edit] External links

[edit] References

  • [1] Israel National News (IsraelNN.com); Benny Elon Presented "Jordan is Palestine" Plan to Prince Hassan, August 17, 2004
  • [2] The CIA World Factbook; Israel - Government
  • [3] Official Knesset (Israeli Parliament) web site; Elections for the 17th Knesset - National Results
  • [4] World Net Daily (WordNetDaily.com); Suppressed poll released following WND story, February 15, 2005
  • [5] The Israeli Initiative - The Right Road to Peace official web site (Yozma.org); The Israeli Initiative - Summary
  • [6] Senator Brownback's recorded speech regarding the Israeli Initiative (YouTube.com)
  • [7] Eidelberg, Paul (2006). The Yamin Israel Peace Plan, Based on a policy paper published by the Ariel Center for Policy Research, October 2001
Languages