User talk:Eliminator of Happyness

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User:AlexiusHoratius, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Spiesr (talk) 19:28, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Eliminator of Happyness

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on User:Eliminator of Happyness, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because User:Eliminator of Happyness is pure vandalism; this includes redirects created during cleanup of page move vandalism.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting User:Eliminator of Happyness, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot (talk) 21:02, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Retarded kids

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Retarded kids, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 23:19, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

User Warning(s)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 23:19, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to RusLine. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. —αἰτίας discussion 23:20, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Retarded kids

Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Acroterion (talk) 23:23, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia you will be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 23:24, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for finally creating a well-written article! I'm glad you took the initiative to contribute constructively. --Iambus (talk) 23:29, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of University of South Colorado

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as University of South Colorado, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Tagishsimon (talk) 23:32, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Please understand that if you continue to vandalise wikipedia, you will be banned from it. --Tagishsimon (talk) 23:38, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Cyprus Park University, you will be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 00:44, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

I wonder if you would mind reading over the criteria for nominating articles for speedy deletion before continuing. I've noted at least three of your recent nominations don't meet the relevant criteria; for instance, almost every professional baseball player in the majors is automatically notable. If you have any questions, I'll try to help. Accounting4Taste:talk 23:44, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Your recent contributions

You seem to be spending your time adding pointless notices to your talk page and those of others. Further abuse of bock and unblock notices will result in a real block. Acroterion (talk) 22:10, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

April 2008

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 22:13, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for The next block will be permanent.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Acroterion (talk) 22:18, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Example (talk · contribs)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Derrick Rose, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please stop inserting misleading information LegoKontribsTalkM 22:21, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

I have fixed it according to this reference [1]. Also, I appreciate you fixing the spelling mistakes on my page, but I would prefer that you left it the way it was. Thanks LegoKontribsTalkM 22:35, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Jmlk17 02:20, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I don't understand why I have been blocked. I am one of the good guys. I look for people who are vandals and I report them. I only edited pages with the truth. I think this ban is aaginst the law."


Decline reason: "You were told that the next block would be permanent, then you did this [2] and this [3]. — Acroterion (talk) 02:33, 16 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Yes I understand that. I am a vigilante because I ban vandals. BTW, AlexiusHoratius is a scokpuppet of Bahameenballin. You must ban him forever!"


Decline reason: "You haven't banned anyone. — Yamla (talk) 18:13, 17 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.