Talk:Eliska Sursova

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Eliska Sursova article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to actors and filmmakers on Wikipedia.

Contents 1 Contributing 2 Personal Life 3 Article Editing 4 biased article 5 Picture

[edit] Contributing

If you have any more verifiable information regarding Eliska Sursova (modeling, acting, etc), please submit to the article to help expand it. Only sourced content will remain on the article! Happy editing.

--Rosario 03:26, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Personal Life

Help expand by providing reliable sources!

--Rosario 07:07, 14 September 2007 (UTC) Bold text

[edit] Article Editing

An acting career spanning 13 years which consists of 12 minor one-episode TV roles and 6 minor movie roles. That, and a failed modeling career define this individual's notability.

So why such an extensive article? This person could be summed up with a few sentences and credit listings. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bamafader (talk • contribs) 13:52, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

I see your point. The tone of the article seems inappropriate and too detailed, like it was written by her publicist. Definitely not NPOV. On the other hand, we could flesh this out into one of those sagas that people occasionally complain about. -- KarlHallowell 15:14, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

It should be cut down and the NPOV fixed for obvious reasons. Bamafader 21:08, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

I have an interest, I could definitely condense the article if it needs to be done per wikipedia standards :) Just give me a little time to get to it - the life of a student!

--[[User: Mizz2fly|Mizz2fly]] 01:16, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

I suppose the article is extensive, especially compared to other biographical wikipedia articles. I will work on eliminating descriptive information and removing opinionated inputs. Thank you for brining it to the attention of people who share an interest in this article, particularly model fans, as we don't want issues with the extent of information. Thankyou again. --Rosario 01:23, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Have cut down article to almost half, will continue to condense. --Rosario 07:21, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

This looks much better. -- KarlHallowell 13:37, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you so much :) -- --Rosario 00:57, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Seems like the article has been cut down to an appropriate size with good and notable information. Well done to whoever edited it, I was just on my way back to do it. Seems we can now call a truce about the article because as of this moment (November 4, 2007) it looks impecable. — --Mizz2fly 09:58, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] biased article

This seems like it was written by her PR agent. C'mon! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.69.90.132 (talk) 07:07, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

This complaint has been made in the above section and was somewhat fixed. The article does need more work to remove 'PR' type formatting, but the information itself is not incorrect and is notable. Seems to be just a sentencing issue with a less bias appeal. — --Rosario 05:43, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

I've done a little editing to re-structure some of the sentencing as mentioned previously. Now, I can't see anything that is written in a bias or non NPOV way, so hopefully the debate about whether or not the article is structured like a press release can be put to rest. --MissLollywood 06:07, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Looks perfect now. I did some editing too. --Bree900 13:17, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Picture

Where's her picture? It's such an extensive and detailed entry, having no picture lets it down? Someone should put one up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Generalhoneypot (talk • contribs) 02:48, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

To be honest there isn't a great selection of pictures on the internet as of yet, or at least none that can be productively used for Wikipedia. A lot of people and site editors have been posting pictures of females they "assume" are her, possibly because they are similar in aesthetics. I'll find one for use though as soon as I can. :) --MissLollywood 12:59, 15 November 2007 (UTC)