Talk:Electricity distribution
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] The global view
Lack of info on European and UK systems and terminology--Light current 22:21, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
I wrote most of the bit about network configuration and initially wrote cabinet substation. I changed it to cabinet transformer in the interest of global terminology. In the Australian industry with which I am familiar all installations which transform into LV are termed substations. I am not sure if this is the case elsewhere. In fact the term we use for a cabinet substation is actually a kiosk substation but I felt "cabinet" would be more global.
On another note I would like to do a lot of edits and try to make this more global. The history part needs trimming though the war of currents is relevant but it starts to wander on a US/UK centric path from there which I think can be generalised a bit more.
There is also a fair bit more required on the general concepts of distribution. Lumberjack Steve 07:38, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
I disagree that the article needs to be more global, it refers to US and other countries already Frmorrison 20:08, 30 August 2007 (UTC).
[edit] General
Help required with formatting !! The text needs wrapping. Tiles
It failed to wrap because the line began with a blank space. Deletion of that one blank space is all that was needed to fix the problem. 131.183.81.100 23:20 Apr 18, 2003 (UTC)
Thanks Tiles 23:28 Apr 18, 2003 (UTC)
Re-added some U.S. info that had been deleted, in the interest of specificity. Making the article international is great, but I think we should cover the various distribution systems separately rather than have an overgeneral article that says too little.
- It is hard to get a balance, but the more detail is added the more explanation is required. For instance, you refer to "grounded" and "wye", I would use "earthed" and "star" for the same concepts. Should readers come to wikipedia for technical detail or a general overview? The article could be expanded to include sections on the distribution systems of different countries if contributors make the effort. Your changes improve the article and create an opportunity to expand and improve it further, if others take up the challenge. Tiles 20:09, 1 Oct 2003 (UTC)
- I agree that a balance is hard to achieve, especially when someone deletes US usages in preference to UK or European usages (or vice- versa). Should not both sets of terms be used, along with a citation of locations for such usage? e.g Earthing (in europe & the UK) also called grounding (in the US). 11 Dec 2006.
I have removed the following: "The skin effect is the tendency of a high-frequency electric current to distribute itself in a conductor so that the current density near the surface of the conductor is greater than that at its core. This means DC power cables can be thinner than AC power cables and still carry the same electrical power. However, transforming DC to high voltages is a difficult process and this offsets the gains from material savings. Use of high voltage DC lines is only now becoming economically interesting for very large distances and with the increased availability of high-temperature superconductors."
It is not relevant to the article, which is about electricity distribution, not transmission, and it contains errors. See high voltage DC for an explanation of the advantages and disadvantages of HVDC and note that it has been used for long distance transmission since 1954. At power system frequencies skin effect is negligible. Tiles 20:09, 1 Oct 2003 (UTC)
Several things are unexplained or unlinked. What do these things mean? (Should they have articles?)
- 2200 volts to ground
- 2200 volts corner-grounded delta
- 2400Y/4160 three-phase systems
- 220Y/380
- earthed/grounded (with respect to distribution)
- wye/star
can anyone help? Rmhermen 20:30, Oct 1, 2003 (UTC)
What is meant by 7620/13200Y? As I understand it, the "Y" refers to the voltage difference between any 2 phases, and the number without the "Y" refers to the voltage between any one phase and ground, but the article could make this clearer. 69.140.152.55 (talk) 05:29, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
I would like to know at least the basics of how power is supplied to vastly varying loads, how it is switched from area to area or whatever depending on power needs, how many different generators supply many different loads over the same wires... Maybe that should belong in a different article? - Omegatron 16:40, Jun 21, 2004 (UTC)
"distribution systems were single phase and used a voltage of 2200 volts corner-grounded delta."
this seems like a contrdiction to me... perhaps someone more familiar with US systems could fix it. --Ali@gwc.org.uk 14:33, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Improvement Drive
Thomas Edison has been nominated on WP:IDRIVE. Vote for this article and help improve it to featured status. --Fenice 14:02, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Houses per transformer
The number of services per transformer is more a matter of how many services per mile (km) there are, than a question of US vs UK. 120 vs 230 is not the issue, since the 3-wire system of 120/240 gives practically the same voltage drop limitations. High density areas, with more than say 10 or 20 services per km of distribution feeder, can efficiently use a big transformer - but if you only have a few homes per km you must still have more transformers because even 230 V won't travel far without unacceptable voltage drop. --Wtshymanski 18:55, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
I think a major part of this is simply different design philosophy. Many small transormers versus smaller number of larger transformers. I am unfamiliar with the US LV network. Do they run LV interconnected systems of simply run services from the transformer to the connection point of the houses?
- "120 vs 230 is not the issue, since the 3-wire system of 120/240 gives practically the same voltage drop limitations.". True 120/240 split phase and 240 single ended single phase have similar volt drop limitations but 240/415 three phase and 240/480 split phase are much better. Plugwash 13:07, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Initial Definition
"Electricity distribution is the penultimate process in the delivery of electricity" This statement doesn't quite ring true. Distribution is the last link in the delivery of electricity to the customer not the second last.
- I had changed this to read the last stage and it has now been changed back to penultimate. I am interested in other views on this. Traditinally there has been 3 stages of electricity delivery - Generation, transmission and distribution. Retail (in Australia at least) is a relatively new concept , introduced after the privatisation of much of the industry. Retail is simply the billing of customers and at most the retailer (in Austrlia) owns the meter. The electricity from a chunk of coal etc to the point of attachment is delivered by three distinct groups only. Lumberjack Steve 11:44, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Definitions
U.S.A. UK !AUS Grounded Earthed Grounded Wye or Y Star Star Transmission line Power line Power line Transmission tower Pylon Power Pole
This isn't right - at least for Australia. The Australian industry is different state by state and different usages are common. In Victoria we would not refer to power lines, we would say transmission lines or distribution feeders. The same for towers, basically any steel lattice structure is referred to as a tower, any wood or concrete pole type strucuture as a pole. Then there are stobie poles in South Australia which are a whole new concept.
I would like to remove the section on different definitions. It is incomplete and inaccurate. If there are any major objections let me know Lumberjack Steve 21:41, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
I have removed the section highlighted above and it was reverted. I am assuming the revert was an error as there was another edit the contributer was concentrating on so I am deleting again. Lumberjack Steve 07:55, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Examples of HVDC transmission lines
[ There exists in Russia one long high voltage dc line.][Also in Quebec, Canada]
The US Pacific Intertie uses HVDC transmission http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_Intertie
also the Furnas Itaipu HVDC transmission line of Brazil http://www.abb.com/cawp/gad02181/C1256D71001E0037C1256833006CB3A4.aspx
68.216.187.22 23:33, 26 August 2006 (UTC)Julian Breidenthal, jbreid at integrity.com
- Well, yes, but this article is about distribution, not transmission. The HVDC article has many more examples. --Wtshymanski 17:56, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Suggested expansion
This article looks at the energy distribution process primarily from a technical standpoint. In business, the term 'distributor' refers to a specific type of 'middleman' business between the manufacturer and retailer or in this case, the companies that pull together the energy sources and maintain a continuous supply, etc. Since this article is linked from the business definition for distributor, I'd suggest adding a section more like film distributor and record distributor. Antonrojo 17:57, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Electrical Diagram
here is a sample electrical distribution layout diagram [[1]] --Billymac00 18:24, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Demand and supply matching
Hi,
I was looking to have a quick browse about power demand and supply matching information, but this seems to be lacking from this and related articles. Does anyone have a good knowledge of control required to match supply and demand, and how that impacts distribution. I wanted to know a bit more about power plants synching to the network and how the flucutation in demand is met without causing voltage fluctuations etc. Thanks User A1 14:50, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] This article is nonsense
There is no such thing as a 'European system' of electricity distribution. The only common defining characteristic of electricity distribution in Moscow, Manchester and Lisbon is how utterly different the systems are. You might as well talk about the 'Northern Hemispherian' system of electricity distribution.
I get the strong impression that this article was written by someone who thinks Europe is some kind of unified cultural or political entity. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.9.138.200 (talk) 13:15, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

