User talk:Elaborateliar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Nakon 03:43, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Civilty

Fine, at least you cited your source this time, but don't treat me, or other editors for that matter, like they're stupid.— Dædαlus^T@lk / Improve 04:17, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Desert Vista High School. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Redrocket (talk) 04:17, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

True, true, I should have read it before I RB'd. I'm kinda tired, ... no. I am tired. Hard day at work.. I may be going to be soon, or not. WP is addicting. Happy editing.— Dædαlus^T@lk / Improve 05:21, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mountain Pointe High School

Hi, concerning [1] may I kindly ask you not to revert me without stating any reasons? I have taken out a passage named 'Controversy' which was absolutely inadequately sourced, the only source that was given cited Wikipedia itself, so this was an endless loop of referencing. Please read WP:BLP to understand that such controversy comments need be very well referenced to reliable sources. If you have independent sources for the allegations in the article (bribery etc.) please propose them on the talk page of the article and drop me a note. But re-insertion of the paragraph without any additions or reasons is out of order. --Mbimmler (talk) 18:01, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. – Zedla (talk) 08:37, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is a blatant violation of our username policy - it is obviously profane, attacks or impersonates another person, or clearly suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and trolling or other disruptive behavior is unacceptable. – Zedla (talk) 08:43, 17 May 2008 (UTC)