Talk:Effects of Hurricane Isabel in Virginia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Effects of Hurricane Isabel in Virginia article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	Effects of Hurricane Isabel in Virginia has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
	Effects of Hurricane Isabel in Virginia is part of the "Hurricane Isabel" series (project page), a featured topic identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do.
Article milestones Date Process Result March 31, 2007 Good article nominee Listed April 13, 2007 Featured topic candidate Promoted May 30, 2008 Good article reassessment Kept Current Status: Good article

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Tropical cyclones, which collaborates on tropical cyclones and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance within WikiProject Tropical cyclones.

Ref #37 is broken.--165.173.137.8 16:12, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, I wasn't aware people were visiting the page already. Hurricanehink (talk) 19:06, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Contents 1 Assessment 2 GA review 3 FT box 4 GA Sweeps Review: Pass

[edit] Assessment

Good work on the final Isabel article. I see you've already GA Nominated it.Mitchazenia 15:56, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA review

You shouldn't need them, but the good article criteria are here.

• Well written: Pass, goes into excellent depth in preparations and impact sections.
• Factually accurate and verifiable: Pass, well-referenced with inline citations.
• Broad in coverage: Pass, adequately covers details from all parts of the state.
• NPOV: Pass
• Stable: Pass
• Images: Pass, each section has at least one relevant image.

Good work. You should nominate Isabel as a featured topic at some point. --Coredesat 04:22, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] FT box

Can someone merge this into the {{ArticleHistory}} box please? Tompw (talk) 20:03, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA Sweeps Review: Pass

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2007. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 00:14, 31 May 2008 (UTC)