Wikipedia:Editor review/Zachary crimsonwolf

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Zachary

Zachary crimsonwolf (talk · contribs) I've been an editor at Wikipedia for almost a year now. Despite that, I'm still crawling slowly on my edits. I need some info to point me in the right direction. I am not a good editor, just what you call average. If you were to check on my edit histories, and give me some comments on it, I would greatly appreciate it Thank you. -Zacharycrimsonwolf 15:16, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Reviews

Overall your a very good editor, you may not have a ridicuolsly high edit count but all your contribs have been good. Your recent edits have had an allmsot 100% summary rate with all minor edits marked correctly, You have contriuted to comunity chores (i.e. deletion nominations & helping editors improve themselves) and your mainspace contribtutions have been high in quality as well as length. I just have a few sugestions for you:

  1. Use the preview button, you often make many edits in a row to the same article in a short space of time. I know this isnt huge but it saves on Wikipedia's memory space as well as keeping a semblance of organization.
  2. Fight them vandals, your talk page mentions your wish to become an administrator, you cant attain that without helping keep our collective work un-vandalized. If you want to make vandal fighting easyier i would recomend twinkle.
  3. Were all friends here, At this instance you got in a little bit of a dispute with another editior, I do realize that he was the one who stated it, just remeber tolerance of ignorance is a virtue.
  4. Help the wikiracers, try to include more links in the sections you add, not nessasary but its generaly a good thing to do.

P.S. I noticed you like Terry Brooks books, I find you guilty of good taste :)

Well, thats all I can come up with right now. Frogive all the spelling errors I made, im in lack of my trusty firefox spellchecker. Have lots of fun :) -Ĭ₠ŴΣĐĝё 08:17, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    Yes. I am proud of my edits to several, The Elfstones of Shannara and The Merlin Conspiracy included. They are the articles which I have put in a lot of my effort into editing, and also probably the articles which I have ever edited to quite an extent.
  2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    No. There are none. I feel rather appreciative at that fact. The editors which I've been in contact with are quite kind and polite. Still, I know that I will have to meet someone who disagrees with me sooner or later. I am ready to face with the fact, and will react appropriately. I understand that politeness goes a long way, and will try to be reasonable at all times.