Wikipedia:Editor review/Wikihermit 3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Wikihermit

Wikihermit (talk · contribs) Hello, I'm Wikihermit. I was wondering what the community thought of my progress since my RfA back in early June. Thanks! ~ Wikihermit 20:12, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Reviews

  • Hello, Wikihermit. You are an excellent editor. I admire your active participation with bots. I also like your participation at AfD, although I would like to see you elaborate on your rationale when nominating articles for deletion. For me, saying "Non-notable person" is not enough. You should say, "Subject fails WP:BIO because he has not received media coverage and no sources could be found, so the article fails WP:V", or something like that. I also wish you would be more careful when nominating anything for deletion, as you have made some annoying mistakes (no offense meant), like when you nominated User:Politics rule for deletion, but I'm willing to forget that, as I'm sure that you have a belly :-) I'm fairly satisfied with your mainspace contributions, but I suggest you become more active on that area. I'm sure that if you continue your great work, you'll breeze through RfA :-) Happy editing! --Boricuaeddie 21:50, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    None in particular. I do a lot of different smaller things, like work with bots, a rewrite articles and cite them, I comment in various XfDs, and I do some mediation with MEDCAB.
  2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    Not really. I had a small dispute when I was new back in April over archiving talk pages, and my RfA was a bummer, but I really haven't had any conflicts.