Wikipedia:Editor review/Think outside the box

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Think outside the box

Think outside the box (talk · contribs) I've been on wikipedia for a while now, on and off. I started out in the sandbox storytelling area, but after those pages got deleted I began to branch out into other parts of wikipedia. I'd like to see what problems I have and what needs to be improved. Think outside the box 14:06, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Reviews

  • Remembered seeing your name around from somewhere, so figured I'd add a bit...
  • Looking through your contribs, I can't really find much to say, actually. You do some vandalfighting, that's good, and you do some article work which is good too (kudos!). Not sure if you're thinking of an RfA; if so, you might want to get a userpage (ya, rly). You might also want to archive your talk page if you become a bit more active; it could get overlong. Also try and think a bit more before commenting on some AfDs; here, for instance, your comments went against the final close, and also weren't really deletion-valid comments. Also, some could read that as delete & merge, which can't be done per GFDL.
  • But look, overall, I'm not seeing anything mindblowingly major, and if you are thinking of RfA, I'd be happy to support you. In fact, I remember where I see your name from; WP:Requests for adminship/G1ggy! It has been a while... dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 06:44, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Comments

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    The articles I've contributed most to are Bottle garden‎, Queen ant, Avril Lavigne's Make 5 Wishes, Stage6, List of Citizen Smith episodes. I can't say they are anything special, but I learnt fairly quickly to include citations with my edits and I always try to improve articles that need it. Most of my article edits are minor such as adding wikilinks, headings and sections.
  1. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    The biggest conflict I've been in was at Talk:Avril Lavigne's Make 5 Wishes#Manga? regarding the article's qualification as manga with several IPs. For example [1] and [2]. Each time it was removed I added it back, and contacted the editor on their talk page to explain why [3] [4]. Although not strictly vandalism, I may have broken the three revert rule, but I hope I acted within reason. I've not been stressed over the edits, as they can simply be changed if needed.