Wikipedia:Editor review/Simply south

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Simply south

Simply south (talk ยท contribs) I have on Wikipedia for nearly a year. I have contributed to a lot of geographical, travel and transportation articles as well as numerous projects. I would just like to see how i am doing. Simply south 16:56, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Reviews

You seem to be editing very well. You have many, many edits that are well spread out and diversified. Your edits seem to be good. The one thing that caught my eye was the 600 word association edits, which is fine, as long as you're having fun, but do not get them mixed up in you total edit count. Other than that, you seem to be editing very well. Happy Editing, Tcpekin 04:37, 21 March 2007 (UTC).


Review by Delldot:

  • Nice contributions to railway related articles.
  • You turned down an RfA nom? That shows patience.
  • Looking back through one of your talk page archives, I see a bunch of messages from other editors asking for clarification on messages of yours, which page you're referring to, etc. Someone asked for clarification of this question, too. Maybe you should look over a post before you save it to make sure you've included all pertinent info and links/diffs that may be useful for readers. I looked at a lot of your user talk edits and didn't know what they were about because they lacked context, but this could be because I was never involved in the discussions, so they may have been clear enough for the recipient.
  • You sometimes forget to use the show preview button (e.g. [1], which I noticed you quickly corrected). Don't worry, we all do it. I try to remember to when I'm editing articles, since it would be a shame if that was messed up when someone loaded it, but in the wp space it's not as big of a deal.
  • A look at your talk page shows that you are friendly and respond well to suggestions that others have for you, such as archiving your talk page. All of your edits to talk and user talk pages that I looked at are civil. You appear to cooperate well with other users. I liked your answer to Q2. If you want to provide links to difs in the conflict you mentioned, I can evaluate how I think you handled yourself in it (drop me a note if I don't notice the links here).

Overall, you've been doing good work, keep it up! delldot talk 23:50, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    I am pleased that i have contributed to the many articles. Of note, i helped the Docklands Light Railway become a Good Article, although i was not the only editor who did this. I have also started heading up the Scottish Transport Project and hope to possibly start one on Hertfordshire. However, i am proud of most other contributions i have made and have been interactive.
  2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    I have to be honest and yes i have been in a few in the past. However, i always have tried to be civil which i maintain. I have also learnt from these which has helped me improve. These have generally been cleared up. In answer to the second part of the question, no these have not generally caused me stress and hopefully i will not have many conflicts. I will as usual try to be civil and maintain NPOV in articles. If i need advice, i will ask other users.

Review by kbthompson

You talk, you listen, above all you are work orientated and task directed. Who can ask anything more of someone who is totally unpaid and does so much? The only advice: think twice, act once. (Which is what I wish I could do more of). Kbthompson 23:43, 18 April 2007 (UTC)