Wikipedia:Editor review/Shindo9Hikaru

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Shindo9Hikaru

Shindo9Hikaru (talk · contribs) Hi, I've been active for a few months now and was wondering what other editors thought of my contributions. Shindo9Hikaru 00:13, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Reviews

I thought it was about time that you were reviewed, so here it comes: You have a fair few edits in the mainspace (400 ish) and you obviously talk to other editors (user talk count 150 ish), which is good! Your edit summary usage: 73% for major edits and 94% for minor edits. --> shows a fair edit summary use, sorry, but I try to be a perfectionist when it comes to edit summaries, although my not-so-many major edits (most of which were done early on) don't count for that, as I didn't use the summary. You are participating in discussions, like for deletions, but what I can't see is maintainance tasks. You are an experienced editor now, and experienced editors are needed for the maintainance tasks. Helping in these is always much appreciated, especially looking at the backlogs that seem to be ever on the increase. WP:MAINT is the maintainance 'hub'. The backlogs are listed here: User:Dragons flight/Category tracker/Summary should you take up the challenge of helping to reduce them. Of course, we are here to build an encyclopedia, so keep up with those content edits! Stwalkerster talk review 15:27, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    In my opinion, my contributions I'm most proud of are: my work expanding articles relating to Elementary Schools in California, such as Warwick Elementary School and Warm Springs Elementary School. I'm also proud of my vandal fighting.
  2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    I've never been in a conflict with another editor that caused me stress, but I have had a few minor run ins such as when an editor that inserted false information into an article and claimed it was true. I calmly explained that this was a violation of WP:OR. In the future, if I have any major conflicts, I will try to contact the editor and try to come to a reasonable agreement.

Additional Questions from Dfrg.msc:

Borrowed from Glen (talk · contribs), I'm sure he wont mind. These should test you editing skills, and show if you have any weaknesses which you can work on. So, just write your answer next to the Question. Good luck.

Speedy Delete or not:

  1. CSD1
  2. CSD2
  3. CSD3
  4. CSD4
  5. CSD5

Vandalism or or not:

  1. [1]
  2. [2]
  3. [3]
  4. [4]
  5. [5]
  6. [6]

Have fun! Dfrg.msc 07:45, 5 July 2007 (UTC)