Wikipedia:Editor review/Prom3th3an

[edit] Prom3th3an

Prom3th3an (talk · contribs) I've been a wikipedian for 6 months, and I would like some feedback, suggestions and critisms. Thanks Prom3th3an (talk) 04:55, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Reviews

Most of your edits seem to be quite good quality; i'm impressed with the user talk/mainspace ratio; one mistake many AV editors make is not telling the user involved that their page is being deleted/their edits have been reverted; it tells them what is wrong with the material and, for vandals, means we can block them :). You're also well-involved in AIV; another good thing, solving the problem (the user) rather than treating the symptom (the vandalism itself).

A couple of minor criticisms; one, you're missing some edit summaries on your edits; about 1 in 4 or 1 in 5 according to Kate. Two, you might want to consider creating and editing new material as well as simply reverting vandalism, although that is (of course) a good way to spend time :). The criticisms/good points are a lot like my weaknesses; focusing on patching up buildings rather than constructing any new 'uns. Hope this has been helpful :). Ironholds 14:23, 3 June 2008 (UTC) Comments

• View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

Questions

1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

   My Extensive anti-vandalism work, also WP:BSI (my humor essay)

2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

   No, Not over editing.