Wikipedia:Editor review/Panser Born

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Panser Born

Panser Born (talk · contribs) Hello. I've been on Wikipedia since October 2006, but only started editing properly in December 06. Since then I've accumulated a modest amount of edits (about 3200 last time I checked), and I've tried to space them out over the different spaces (mainspace, userspace etc). I'm interested in how well I'm doing at the moment, so any comments will be much appreciated. =) -Panser Born- (talk) 18:31, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Reviews

Salut, Panser Born. Let me start off by saying that I am sorry no one has gotten to your editor review yet, we have a backlog here. Panser Born, your earliest edit was at 20:57, 21 August 2006. Since then, as of Thu Jun 14 22:03:09 2007 GMT, you have made 4222 edits in your time here. You have, indeed, spread your edits out throughout the different spaces. You use edit summary, which is a very good thing. It seems that you have also familiarized yourself with Wikipedia policy. Please contact me if you have interest in being nominated to become an admin. Wishes! --wpktsfs (talk) 22:13, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    I'm very pleased with the contributions I've made to the Kenny G article. I'm responsible for quite a bit of the content (and I think almost all of the references) in that article, and took the time to create pages for all of his albums to date (which can be seen in the discography section). I'm quite proud of the four featured articles that I have recorded for the Spoken Wikipedia project, and I hope to carry on making these. I've also added quite a bit of information to articles on mammals (there's a list of them on my user page).
  2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    I've been in a couple of edit conflicts — whenever I find myself in a situation like that, I always remain polite, and bear in mind the WP:AGF and WP:CIV policies. When dealing with the problem, I always try to use policies to support my argument, while at the same time try and show the person I'm debating with that I understand their point of view. I will continue to deal with edit conflicts in this way in the future.

Additional Questions from Dfrg.msc:

Borrowed from Glen (talk · contribs), I'm sure he wont mind. These should test you editing skills, and show if you have any weaknesses which you can work on. So, just write your answer next to the Question. Good luck.

Speedy Delete or not:

  1. CSD1
  2. CSD2
  3. CSD3
  4. CSD4
  5. CSD5

Vandalism or or not:

  1. [1]
  2. [2]
  3. [3]
  4. [4]
  5. [5]
  6. [6]

Have fun! Dfrg.msc 07:44, 5 July 2007 (UTC)